search for: r178530

...g overhead several days ago. After that, I kept on moving forward for this project. By now, I am much familiar with Polly and LLVM. Thanks to the help from Polly and LLVM group, I have also provided some LLVM-Polly patch files for this project, such as r179673, r179586, r179159, r179158, r179157, r178530. I am confident that I am on the right position to propose a GSoC project. I have wrote a GSoC proposal draft in https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808. I am pleased to answer any questions about this project. Any advice or comment would be appreciated. Thank you very much! Best regards, Sta...

On 03/23/2013 05:23 PM, tanmx_star wrote: > Dear Tobies, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I have checked the experiment and I found some of the data is mismatched because of incorrect manual copy and paste, so I have written a Shell script to automatically collect data. Newest data is listed in the attached file. Yes, automatizing those experiments to make them reproducible is a

...g overhead several days ago. After that, I kept on moving forward for this project. By now, I am much familiar with Polly and LLVM. Thanks to the help from Polly and LLVM group, I have also provided some LLVM-Polly patch files for this project, such as r179673, r179586, r179159, r179158, r179157, r178530. I am confident that I am on the right position to propose a GSoC project. >> >> >>I have written a GSoC proposal draft in https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808. I am pleased to answer any questions about this project. Any advice or comment would be appreciated. >> >&gt...

...g overhead several days ago. After that, I kept on moving forward for this project. By now, I am much familiar with Polly and LLVM. Thanks to the help from Polly and LLVM group, I have also provided some LLVM-Polly patch files for this project, such as r179673, r179586, r179159, r179158, r179157, r178530. I am confident that I am on the right position to propose a GSoC project. > > >I have written a GSoC proposal draft in https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808. I am pleased to answer any questions about this project. Any advice or comment would be appreciated. > > >Thank you very...

...group) > r179673: Remove unneeded RegionSimplify pass r179586: Support SCoPs with > multiple entry edges r179159: Support SCoPs with multiple exit edges > r179158: Codegen: Replace region exit and entries recursively r179157: > RegionInfo: Add helpers to replace entry/exit recursively r178530: > ScopDetection: Use isTopLevelRegion > > In this project, I plan to spend two weeks to reduce canonicalization > overhead. It was a good idea to write down what you plan to do each week. > Week 1: Profile the compiling overhead of each canonicalization pass, > including Promo...