Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r174324".
Did you mean:
r174328
2013 Feb 04
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Promote AArch64 to be built by default
...s in AArch64 code. I'll fix them tomorrow. There
may be more warnings not yet noticed, I've been fighting actual
failures today.
The rest are believed resolved:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin11-self-mingw32/builds/9057:
Improper 33-bit integer constant. Fixed in r174324.
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/cmake-clang-i686-msvc10/builds/1850
Improper use of StringRef causing errors when compiler is MSVC
(fixed in r174328)
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-msys/builds/409:
llvm-config reported an error, believed to be the result of
incomplete configure step. 410 s...
2013 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Promote AArch64 to be built by default
On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We'd like to promote the AArch64 backend to being built by default. I
> know it's very soon after the initial upload, but we think the backend
> is in a good position and should be stable.
>
> We'd very much like to get it tested in more diverse environments
>
2013 Jan 31
4
[LLVMdev] RFC: Promote AArch64 to be built by default
Hi all,
We'd like to promote the AArch64 backend to being built by default. I
know it's very soon after the initial upload, but we think the backend
is in a good position and should be stable.
We'd very much like to get it tested in more diverse environments
provided by the buildbots, and are committed to cleaning up any
fallout as soon as possible, or as a last resort reverting the