Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r171975".
2013 Jan 09
0
[LLVMdev] Failure building llvm/clang from source using binary clang package on Mageia 2
...ng llvm's configure:
>
> Using clang 3.1, which has previously worked, there is no error.
>
> So it looks to me, based on my tests, that your patch is successful. I look
> forward to this update in llvm on subversion.
I've committed a slightly different variant of this patch r171975.
Thank you for testing!
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
2013 Jan 08
3
[LLVMdev] Failure building llvm/clang from source using binary clang package on Mageia 2
On 01/07/2013 08:39 AM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Edward Diener
> <eldlistmailingz at tropicsoft.com> wrote:
>> On Mageia 2 I have installed the binary clang package clang3.0-7. When I
>> tried to build the latest llvm/clang from source using this binary clang
>> I get this error:
>>
>> 1) In file included from
>>
2013 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] Failure building llvm/clang from source using binary clang package on Mageia 2
...>
>> Using clang 3.1, which has previously worked, there is no error.
>>
>> So it looks to me, based on my tests, that your patch is successful. I look
>> forward to this update in llvm on subversion.
>
> I've committed a slightly different variant of this patch r171975.
>
> Thank you for testing!
Unfortunately, after an attempt to use the latest 'configure' update on
CentOS 6.3 I think your version may be slightly flawed.
I had been able to build clang from source on CentOS 6.3 using clang
2.8-14 that is distributed as a binary. After your updat...
2013 Jan 12
0
[LLVMdev] Failure building llvm/clang from source using binary clang package on Mageia 2
...reviously worked, there is no error.
>>>
>>> So it looks to me, based on my tests, that your patch is successful. I
>>> look
>>> forward to this update in llvm on subversion.
>>
>>
>> I've committed a slightly different variant of this patch r171975.
>>
>> Thank you for testing!
>
>
> Unfortunately, after an attempt to use the latest 'configure' update on
> CentOS 6.3 I think your version may be slightly flawed.
>
> I had been able to build clang from source on CentOS 6.3 using clang 2.8-14
> that is di...
2013 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Failure building llvm/clang from source using binary clang package on Mageia 2
...o error.
>>>>
>>>> So it looks to me, based on my tests, that your patch is successful. I
>>>> look
>>>> forward to this update in llvm on subversion.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've committed a slightly different variant of this patch r171975.
>>>
>>> Thank you for testing!
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, after an attempt to use the latest 'configure' update on
>> CentOS 6.3 I think your version may be slightly flawed.
>>
>> I had been able to build clang from source on CentOS 6.3 us...