Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "r171630".
2013 Jan 05
2
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...gure will choose clang if it is
>> found in the path. This contradicts what is written at
>> http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements, where it says it
>> will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps that explanation needs to be
>> updated.
>
> Updated docs in r171630.
>
>> Finally I found that if llvm/configure uses clang instead of gcc, it
>> invariably fails on my Linux distros because it is using the gcc
>> distributed included directories and an earlier version of clang will
>> often fail with these gcc header files. Once I force...
2013 Jan 05
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...found out that llvm/configure will choose clang if it is
> found in the path. This contradicts what is written at
> http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements, where it says it
> will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps that explanation needs to be
> updated.
Updated docs in r171630.
> Finally I found that if llvm/configure uses clang instead of gcc, it
> invariably fails on my Linux distros because it is using the gcc
> distributed included directories and an earlier version of clang will
> often fail with these gcc header files. Once I force llvm/configure to
&g...
2013 Jan 06
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...tp://llvm.org/docs/**GettingStarted.html#**requirements<http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements>,
>>> where it says it
>>> will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps that explanation needs to be
>>> updated.
>>>
>>
>> Updated docs in r171630.
>>
>>  Finally I found that if llvm/configure uses clang instead of gcc, it
>>> invariably fails on my Linux distros because it is using the gcc
>>> distributed included directories and an earlier version of clang will
>>> often fail with these gcc header fil...
2013 Jan 05
4
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
On 01/05/2013 11:32 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
> On 1/5/2013 7:10 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
>> Is it possible to build llvm with a previous version of clang installed
>> as a binary ? If so, how do I get llvm/configure to use the binary
>> version of clang rather than gcc to build the latest version of llvm ?
>>
> 
> Set environment variables CC and CXX to point
2013 Jan 06
3
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...l#__requirements
>             <http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements>,
>             where it says it
>             will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps that explanation
>             needs to be
>             updated.
>
>
>         Updated docs in r171630.
>
>             Finally I found that if llvm/configure uses clang instead of
>             gcc, it
>             invariably fails on my Linux distros because it is using the gcc
>             distributed included directories and an earlier version of
>             clang will
>...
2013 Jan 06
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...rg/docs/GettingStarted.html#requirements>
>> >,
>>
>>             where it says it
>>             will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps that explanation
>>             needs to be
>>             updated.
>>
>>
>>         Updated docs in r171630.
>>
>>             Finally I found that if llvm/configure uses clang instead of
>>             gcc, it
>>             invariably fails on my Linux distros because it is using the
>> gcc
>>             distributed included directories and an earlier version of
>...
2013 Jan 06
3
[LLVMdev] Building llvm from source with clang instead of gcc
...tarted.html#requirements>>,
>
>                      where it says it
>                      will use the first GCC it finds. Perhaps that
>         explanation
>                      needs to be
>                      updated.
>
>
>                  Updated docs in r171630.
>
>                      Finally I found that if llvm/configure uses clang
>         instead of
>                      gcc, it
>                      invariably fails on my Linux distros because it is
>         using the gcc
>                      distributed included director...