Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r171428".
Did you mean:
3871428
2013 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] DebugInfo library and relocations in the .debug_line section
...es. If I let clang finish
> things and create an executable, both dwarfdump and llvm-dwarfdump show
> unique load-based addresses for everything.****
>
> **
>
Right. This is pretty easy, especially if you just look at my last patch
that added a new reloc handler for .debug_info.dwo (r171428). I've been
meaning to do this, but it hasn't bubbled up to the top of my queue yet.
-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130110/bfa4ec80/attachment.html>
2013 Jan 10
2
[LLVMdev] DebugInfo library and relocations in the .debug_line section
Actually, MCJIT doesn't perform relocations on debug sections. I'm not sure that would matter anyway. The place where I'm handling the debug information is outside MCJIT and the MCJIT relocation code isn't really accessible at that point.
Right now, when MCJIT emits an object image, it broadcasts an event to any registered listeners indicating that an object was emitted, passing
2013 Jan 11
2
[LLVMdev] DebugInfo library and relocations in the .debug_line section
...ss zero just like llvm-dwarf does. If I let clang finish things and create an executable, both dwarfdump and llvm-dwarfdump show unique load-based addresses for everything.
Right. This is pretty easy, especially if you just look at my last patch that added a new reloc handler for .debug_info.dwo (r171428). I've been meaning to do this, but it hasn't bubbled up to the top of my queue yet.
-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130111/4121ef11/attachment.html>