search for: r16xxxx

...gt;> >>> -Chris >>> >> >> Rather it is the opposite, people are not approving patches they should. >> > > Can you provide some examples of the problems you are seeing? Here is what happens. I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking because that is the process. In the past few days CODE_OWNERS.TXT on the trunk has been changing while 3.2 h...

Hi Pawel, >> Can you provide some examples of the problems you are seeing? > > Here is what happens. > > I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into > 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes > PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner > and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking because > that is the process. In the past few days CODE_OWNERS.TXT > on the trunk has...

...18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Pawel, > > >>> Can you provide some examples of the problems you are seeing? >> >> >> Here is what happens. >> >> I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into >> 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes >> PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner >> and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking because >> that is the process. In the past few days CODE_OWNERS.TXT >&g...

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <pawel at 32bitmicro.com>wrote: > On 11/17/2012 6:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> I think that the code owner process is becoming complicated and I am > not sure if it serves Chris's original intent. I don't think

...s On Nov 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Pawel, > >>> Can you provide some examples of the problems you are seeing? >> >> Here is what happens. >> >> I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into >> 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes >> PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner >> and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking because >> that is the process. In the past few days CODE_OWNERS.TXT >&g...

On 11/17/2012 6:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > >> I think that the code owner process is becoming complicated and I am not sure if it serves Chris's original intent. I don't think that we need to change every file nor do we need an automatic tool to find the owner. I think that a simple text