search for: r169782

...d version of that test. Thanks -Anshu --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation On 12/11/2012 5:47 AM, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: > Hi again, > > I can confirm r169783 fixes the problem. My testbench segfaulted in > r169782 but works after your commit. > > We can close the issue. > > Thanks, > > Carlos > > > 2012/12/11 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama <csanchezdll at gmail.com > <mailto:csanchezdll at gmail.com>> > > Hi Anshu, > > I got a testbench which fails (a...

...; -Anshu > > --- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by The Linux Foundation > > On 12/11/2012 5:47 AM, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: > > Hi again, > > I can confirm r169783 fixes the problem. My testbench segfaulted in > r169782 but works after your commit. > > We can close the issue. > > Thanks, > > Carlos > > > 2012/12/11 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama <csanchezdll at gmail.com> > >> Hi Anshu, >> >> I got a testbench which fails (and segfaults) consistently with an >&g...

Hi again, I can confirm r169783 fixes the problem. My testbench segfaulted in r169782 but works after your commit. We can close the issue. Thanks, Carlos 2012/12/11 Carlos Sánchez de La Lama <csanchezdll at gmail.com> > Hi Anshu, > > I got a testbench which fails (and segfaults) consistently with an > environment (gcc + os) conveniently preserved in a virtual...

Hi Anshu, I got a testbench which fails (and segfaults) consistently with an environment (gcc + os) conveniently preserved in a virtual machine. I will confirm that it is gone there and report. Thanks for the fix :) Carlos 2012/12/10 Anshuman Dasgupta <adasgupt at codeaurora.org> > Carlos, > > I committed a fix in r169783. Thanks for catching this. > > However, I could