Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r168316".
2012 Dec 11
0
[LLVMdev] PowerPC 64 build bots...
...were unaffected, they're still running
> on Fedora 16.
Ah, now I see the python/tls problems in runs earlier this month.
I'm still a bit confused because I distinctly remember that I saw
this bot go from red to green back last month, when I checked in
the last of a series of commits as r168316 (I was specifically
trying to make the bots go green at the time ...).
Is it possible that the python/tls problem was introduced at some
point in between, that is late November? Unfortunately, the build
bot logs don't appear to go back that far.
In any case, thanks for fixing the python issu...
2012 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] PowerPC 64 build bots...
On 10.12.2012, at 15:19, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been working to revive the PPC64 build bots, and succeeded, but
>> not for the right reasons. There were still bootstrap assertion
>> failures and other pretty blatant errors. Then we figured out why:
>> the Clang
2012 Dec 11
1
[LLVMdev] PowerPC 64 build bots...
...running
> > on Fedora 16.
>
> Ah, now I see the python/tls problems in runs earlier this month.
>
> I'm still a bit confused because I distinctly remember that I saw
> this bot go from red to green back last month, when I checked in
> the last of a series of commits as r168316 (I was specifically
> trying to make the bots go green at the time ...).
>
> Is it possible that the python/tls problem was introduced at some
> point in between, that is late November? Unfortunately, the build
> bot logs don't appear to go back that far.
Yes... it was introdu...