search for: r167601

...ult to find useful > information matching this problem. Don't worry, you're not the only one. This area could use some improvement (& there's some amount of work going on in that area) > * Can I look up results for r167602 (or closely afterwards)? (Can I compare > it with r167601 or less?) I don't believe so - I think only a certain sliding window of logs are kept (& I don't know of an easy way to view a particular revision across the bots either) > * How can I see if some buildbot is using gcc-4.7.1 (or later)? I don't believe so - some bots indicate...

...() argument of incompatible type!"' failed. This made me take a look at the LLVM Buildbot pages at http://lab.llvm.org:8011/. However, I find it difficult to find useful information matching this problem. * Can I look up results for r167602 (or closely afterwards)? (Can I compare it with r167601 or less?) * How can I see if some buildbot is using gcc-4.7.1 (or later)? * There seems to be quite a few failed builds in the buildbots. Which buildbot configurations should I expect to be maintained to produce mostly non-failed builds? * Is there some general introduction document for reading the...

On 12 November 2012 04:18, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> * Can I look up results for r167602 (or closely afterwards)? (Can I compare >> it with r167601 or less?) > > I don't believe so - I think only a certain sliding window of logs are > kept (& I don't know of an easy way to view a particular revision > across the bots either) That'd be a very nice feature! --renato