Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r163685".
Did you mean:
r163185
2012 Sep 12
1
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Hi Jakob, Sergei,
I've updated getLastUseBefore in r163685. I'm still looking into a couple
of errors, but I suspect that these are due to my build configuration,
rather than the patch.
Sergei - could you let me know if this fixes your issue? Thanks again for
all of your work tracking this down.
> It is best to avoid the MCRegUnitRootIterator+MCS...
2012 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
On Sep 10, 2012, at 2:26 AM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've got a good test case that I'm working on at the moment. I noticed something odd though: Is '0' a valid register unit? I'm seeing a LiveInterval with li->reg == 0 show up, which previously wasn't valid. We have a few checks around the place to disregard the '0' physreg - could
2012 Sep 10
3
[LLVMdev] Assert in LiveInterval update
Hi Jakob,
I've got a good test case that I'm working on at the moment. I noticed
something odd though: Is '0' a valid register unit? I'm seeing a
LiveInterval with li->reg == 0 show up, which previously wasn't valid. We
have a few checks around the place to disregard the '0' physreg - could
these trigger on interaction with a '0' interval? That could