Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "r161751".
Did you mean:
r161753
2012 Aug 14
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM CommandLine 2.0 Library Usage
...d also be useful to be able to specify option descriptions dynamically.
Currently it's implemented using a local cl::opt/cl::extrahelp objects so
that the order of creation can be defined more explicitly (r161753). But
I'm not sure this is a supported use-case. I've added a test for it
(r161751), but it would be nice to make sure if it aligns well with the
library design plans.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Kornienko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120814/548c9ea1/attachment.html>