Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r159135".
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:
> Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in
> CMake. This is ... quite challenging.
>
> I think I can get it to work with one significant caveat: it will require
> manual dependency management. None of the automatic header tracking. I
> think this is fine
2012 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
...gt;> folks would be most interested in working with.
>>
>> Second, it would be extremely helpful to have a very firm separation
>> between bucket #1 and bucket #2.
>>
>
> (answering parts at a time)
> Agree. I am going to fix that now.
>
This part is fixed by r159135.
thanks!!
--kcc
>
>
>> Currently, there is one collection of tests clearly in bucket #1
>> (asan_noinst_test.cc), and plenty of tests clearly in bucket #2, but there
>> seems to be quite a bit of overlap as well. For example, I would naively
>> expect asan_interfa...
2012 Jun 25
4
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
Context: I'm trying to implement support for ASan's unittest suite in
CMake. This is ... quite challenging.
I think I can get it to work with one significant caveat: it will require
manual dependency management. None of the automatic header tracking. I
think this is fine in some cases, and not so fine in other cases. Let me
explain.
It feels like these tests are really comprised of two