Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r149814".
2012 Feb 07
1
[LLVMdev] ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug
...mely hard to pin down. For months now, we've noticed
our stage 2 LLVM ARM build has sporadic failures. Tests would start
failing, then start working, then start failing, etc, for no apparent
reason.
The test case I have (llc.bc, which is all of llc in bitcode form, 44.8
MB), only works against r149814. And in this case, there are only 2 cases
of the miscompile occurring in the 93 MB .s file. I cannot reproduce the
failure in ToT LLVM using the same bitcode file, or any other bitcode I
have. All it takes is a slight bit of code change for the schedule to
completely change, and suddenly the proble...
2012 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug
I've committed a fix: r149970. Please try it. I would really appreciate it if you can provide us with a test case (unreduced test case is fine).
Evan
On 2012 2 4, at 09:46, David Meyer <pdox at google.com> wrote:
> Evan & llvmdev,
>
> I'm seeing a case where ARM Load/Store optimizer is breaking code. I have not had any luck trying to come up with a minimal example;
2012 Feb 04
4
[LLVMdev] ARMLoadStoreOptimizer bug
Evan & llvmdev,
I'm seeing a case where ARM Load/Store optimizer is breaking code. I have
not had any luck trying to come up with a minimal example; it is breaking
in our stage 2 LLVM build.
But here's what I'm seeing in the debug output:
# Before ARMLoadStoreOptimizer:
BB#21: derived from LLVM BB %cond.end
Live Ins: %LR %R0 %R1 %R7 %R10 %R11
Predecessors according to