Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r145627".
Did you mean:
145627
2011 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
...p))
>
> This is an abuse of llvm_unreachable. It should just replace "if ule" check with:
Ah, so it is. I hadn't noticed (was just looking at the simple
transformation without actually parsing the semantics any further).
Committed with assert instead of abusive unreachable in r145627
Thanks,
- David
2011 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
...abuse of llvm_unreachable. It should just replace "if ule" check with:
>
> Ah, so it is. I hadn't noticed (was just looking at the simple
> transformation without actually parsing the semantics any further).
>
> Committed with assert instead of abusive unreachable in r145627
Thanks!
-Chris
2011 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:08 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang
>>> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less
>>> interesting).
2011 Dec 01
3
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote:
>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang
>> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less
>> interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is
>>