search for: r145493

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r145493".

2011 Nov 30
3
[LLVMdev] bdver1 cpu(bulldozer) support with dragonegg
...ocessor) > > this is coming directly from LLVM which doesn't know about bulldozer yet. > >> Is there any plan to support this cpu ? > > I don't know. Hopefully someone who knows something about this will comment. I added a basic description for bdver1 and bdver2 in r145493. LLVM doesn't know many of bulldozer's new instructions though. - Ben > > Ciao, Duncan. > >> >> >> Here the full example the source file doesn't matter. >> >> gcc -s -static -Wall -O2 -march=native -fplugin=dragonegg.so >> -fplugin-arg...
2011 Dec 01
0
[LLVMdev] bdver1 cpu(bulldozer) support with dragonegg
...is coming directly from LLVM which doesn't know about bulldozer yet. >> >>> Is there any plan to support this cpu ? >> >> I don't know. Hopefully someone who knows something about this will comment. > > I added a basic description for bdver1 and bdver2 in r145493. > LLVM doesn't know many of bulldozer's new instructions though. We have implementations for XOP. Again, I'll be pushing it back as soon as we get 3.0 merged. That will take a bit of effort as we have to resolve various AVX conflicts. -Dave
2011 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] bdver1 cpu(bulldozer) support with dragonegg
Hi Jan, > if I compile with dragonegg and -march=native I get this message: > 'bdver1' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor) this is coming directly from LLVM which doesn't know about bulldozer yet. > Is there any plan to support this cpu ? I don't know. Hopefully someone who knows something about this will comment. Ciao, Duncan. >
2011 Dec 01
2
[LLVMdev] bdver1 cpu(bulldozer) support with dragonegg
...'t know about > bulldozer yet. >>> >>>> Is there any plan to support this cpu ? >>> >>> I don't know.  Hopefully someone who knows something about this > will comment. >> >> I added a basic description for bdver1 and bdver2 in r145493. >> LLVM doesn't know many of bulldozer's new instructions though. > > We have implementations for XOP.  Again, I'll be pushing it back as soon > as we get 3.0 merged.  That will take a bit of effort as we have to > resolve various AVX conflicts. > >          ...
2011 Nov 29
3
[LLVMdev] bdver1 cpu(bulldozer) support with dragonegg
Hello, if I compile with dragonegg and -march=native I get this message: 'bdver1' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring processor) Is there any plan to support this cpu ? Here the full example the source file doesn't matter. gcc -s -static -Wall -O2 -march=native -fplugin=dragonegg.so -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns pointer.c -o pointer