Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r143101".
Did you mean:
r143100
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...d to me); this e-mail contains
additional benchmark results.
First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the
processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for
discussion.
I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang
head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc
comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3
without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize
-unroll-allow-partial -O3 with no other optimizati...
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...tional benchmark results.
>
> First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
> necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the
> processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for
> discussion.
>
> I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang
> head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc
> comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3
> without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize
> -unroll-allow-partial -O3 with...
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...are preliminary results because I did not do the things
> > > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the
> > > processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for
> > > discussion.
> > >
> > > I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang
> > > head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc
> > > comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3
> > > without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize
>...
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...> > First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
> > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the
> > processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for
> > discussion.
> >
> > I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang
> > head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc
> > comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3
> > without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize
> > -unroll-al...