Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r142".
Did you mean:
142
2006 Aug 28
2
Capistrano deploy failing with :if Expression Syntax failure
...l_cluster-0.2.0/lib/mongrel_cluster/recipes.rb:1>
* executing task deploy
** transaction: start
* executing task update_code
* querying latest revision...
* executing "if [[ ! -d
/usr/local/www/rails_apps/ideeli/releases/20060828223656 ]]; then\n
/usr/local/bin/svn co -q -r142
svn://216.12.167.103/ideeli/trunk
/usr/local/www/rails_apps/ideeli/releases/20060828223656 &&\n
(test -e /usr/local/www/rails_apps/ideeli/revisions.log || touch
/usr/local/www/rails_apps/ideeli/revisions.log && chmod 666
/usr/local/www/rails_apps/ideeli/revisions.log) &&...
2010 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] Question on X86 backend
...R91, R92, R93, R94, R95,
R96, R97, R98, R99, R100, R101, R102, R103, R104, R105, R106, R107, R108, R109, R110, R111,
R112, R113, R114, R115, R116, R117, R118, R119, R120, R121, R122, R123, R124, R125, R126, R127,
R128, R129, R130, R131, R132, R133, R134, R135, R136, R137, R138, R139, R140, R141, R142, R143,
R144, R145, R146, R147, R148, R149, R150, R151, R152, R153, R154, R155, R156, R157, R158, R159,
R160, R161, R162, R163, R164, R165, R166, R167, R168, R169, R170, R171, R172, R173, R174, R175,
R176, R177, R178, R179, R180, R181, R182, R183, R184, R185, R186, R187, R188, R189, R190, R191,...
2010 Jun 15
2
[LLVMdev] Question on X86 backend
Hi Micah,
> In X86InstrInfo.td for Call Instructions, it mentions that Uses for
> argument registers are added manually. Can someone point me to the
> location where they are added as the comment doesn't reference a
> where or how?
the register uses are added by the function
X86TargetLowering::LowerCall() during the DAG Lowering phase. This is
the relevant code segment:
// Add
2006 Nov 05
5
backgroundrb preview
Hi Ezra/skaar,
Wow man, the exercise was worth it. The connection closed problem with
socket as i mentioned in my earlier mails...completely disappeared,
and now i can connect only once to the socket and keep reading..till
end of its days.
Literally impossible with older release of backgroundrb.
This could also potentially solve the issues people were having with
ActiveRecord.
As i said