Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "r120689".
2010 Dec 02
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...aded a patch for the "*Kind enum" rule to
http://codereview.appspot.com/3402041
and attached it to this message too. Would you please take a look? Thanks,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) <wan at google.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Chris and John. Committed in r120689. I'll try to add the
> *Kind rule in a separate patch. Cheers,
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>>...
2010 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
Thanks, Chris and John. Committed in r120689. I'll try to add the
*Kind rule in a separate patch. Cheers,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I've uploaded a new patch to http...
2010 Dec 02
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I've uploaded a new patch to http://codereview.appspot.com/3264041.
> It's also attached to this message.
This patch looks great to me, please apply, thanks!
> I think I've addressed all your comments, except "when in doubt, an
> enum should be a 'Kind'". I don't
2010 Dec 10
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] draft rule for naming types/functions/variables
...ied, thanks! After applying it, I went through and restructured the section for readability:
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_naming
-Chris
>
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) <wan at google.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, Chris and John. Committed in r120689. I'll try to add the
>> *Kind rule in a separate patch. Cheers,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 11:29 PM, Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi C...
2015 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: variable names
After having read through this long thread, I'm having trouble
spotting a case of someone saying lowerCamelCase variable names is a
bad idea. Nick's original proposal looks good to me. What do we need
to do to move forward here?
Thanks,
Greg
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Chandler Carruth