search for: r119335

Hi Dan, The tutorial in r119335 does not build : the basicAA pass creation needs to be declared. This is addressed with the 'missing-include' patch, which updates both source code & documentation. The second point is that beside basicAA, to get the optimizations as shown in the tutorial, (sin(x)*sin(x) -> sin(x)^2...

On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison wrote: > Hi Dan, > > The tutorial in r119335 does not build : the basicAA pass creation needs to be declared. This is addressed with the 'missing-include' patch, which updates both source code & documentation. Applied, thanks. > The second point is that beside basicAA, to get the optimizations as shown in the tutorial, (sin(x...

On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Rob Pieke wrote: > SUCCESS! > > Sorry, I had removed the addFnAttr() call by accident. Using the basicAA pass and ReadOnly, as you suggested, works like a charm! > > :) Thanks. I've updated the documentation and examples in r119169. I didn't update the OCaml documentation or examples yet. It looks like the OCaml bindings don't expose

...November 16, 2010 6:45 PM To: Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Optimization of calls to functions without side effects (from Kaleidoscope example) On Nov 16, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison wrote: > Hi Dan, > > The tutorial in r119335 does not build : the basicAA pass creation needs to be declared. This is addressed with the 'missing-include' patch, which updates both source code & documentation. Applied, thanks. > The second point is that beside basicAA, to get the optimizations as shown in the tutorial, (sin(x...

SUCCESS! Sorry, I had removed the addFnAttr() call by accident. Using the basicAA pass and ReadOnly, as you suggested, works like a charm! :) > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Pieke > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 4:40 PM > To: 'Duncan Sands' > Cc: 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu'; 'Dan Gohman' > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Optimization of calls to