Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "r115571".
2010 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] Illegal optimization in LLVM 2.8 during SelectionDAG - 115571 fixes this
On 5 Oct 2010, at 01:48, Evan Cheng wrote:
> Please test if r115571 has fixed it.
thanks a lot, I tested and 115571 fixed this.
can it still be merged into 2.8 before release?
2010 Oct 04
0
[LLVMdev] Illegal optimization in LLVM 2.8 during SelectionDAG
Please test if r115571 has fixed it.
Evan
On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote:
> Bill Wendling wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote:
>>
>>> Bill Wendling wrote:
>>>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote:
>>>>
>>&g...
2010 Oct 04
2
[LLVMdev] Illegal optimization in LLVM 2.8 during SelectionDAG
Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 2:13 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote:
>
>> Bill Wendling wrote:
>>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Heikki Kultala wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 29 Sep 2010, at 06:25, Heikki Kultala wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Our architecture has 1-bit boolean predicate registers.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've