Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "r112805".
Did you mean:
112805
2010 Sep 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
...s slower so it would
> be much appreciated to revert these changes for the 2.8 release.
>
Hi Nicolas,
Are you able to narrow it down to one of those patches? From the comments, 112804 and 112805 seem fairly innocuous:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r112805 | bruno | 2010-09-01 21:20:26 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) | 1 line
Move condition out to prepare for more matching
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r112804 | bruno | 2010-09-01 20:57:58 -0700 (Wed, 01 Sep 2010) | 1 line
Remove checking for isUNPCKL_v_undef_Mas...
2010 Sep 08
8
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Nicolas Capens
<nicolas.capens at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> It's not broken, but the performance is crippled.
>
> I noticed that the code still contains some MMX instructions, but several
> operations get expanded (apparently swizzling and such get expanded to a
> large number of byte moves).
I think some changes related to