Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r109996".
2010 Aug 02
0
[LLVMdev] Problem building llvm after r109996 (Add InitializeNativeTargetAsmPrinter())
Hi Jean-Daniel,
My fault, I'm sure, but I don't see the problem yet.
Is it possible your version of llvm/Config/AsmPrinters.def has X86 listed twice?
- Daniel
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas
<devlists at shadowlab.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After I try making a clean build and got the following error:
>
> llvm[3]: Compiling EDDisassembler.cpp for
2010 Aug 02
2
[LLVMdev] Problem building llvm after r109996 (Add InitializeNativeTargetAsmPrinter())
Hello,
After I try making a clean build and got the following error:
llvm[3]: Compiling EDDisassembler.cpp for Release build
In file included from /llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetSelect.h:38,
from /llvm/lib/MC/MCDisassembler/EDDisassembler.cpp:37:
/llvm/stage1/include/llvm/Config/AsmPrinters.def: In function ‘void LLVMInitializeX86TargetAsmPrinter()’:
2010 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] MC-JIT Patches 1/3
I have cleaned up the code somewhat that Olivier wrote and split up the patch into three pieces. This first is to make the MCJIT not have to initialize all asm printers, but only the native one.
- Jan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0018_nativeasmprinterinit.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 12993 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2010 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] MC-JIT Patches 1/3
Hi Jan,
Applied with edits in r109996, thanks!
I wasn't happy about the change to add "Target" everywhere -- I just
added a local hack in TargetSelect.h to workaround this. We should
really change the definition of LLVM_NATIVE_TARGET, but I am not in a
configure hacking mood.
- Daniel
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM,...