Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r108246".
2010 Jul 13
2
[LLVMdev] Debugging docs wrong?
http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#ccxx_compile_units
!1 = metadata !{
i32 524329, ;; Tag
metadata !"MySource.cpp",
metadata !"/Users/mine/sources",
metadata !3 ;; Compile unit
}
!2 is the Compile Unit, right? !3 is also wrong.
--
cheers,
--renato
http://systemcall.org/
Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
2010 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] Debugging docs wrong?
...ompile_units
>
> !1 = metadata !{
> i32 524329, ;; Tag
> metadata !"MySource.cpp",
> metadata !"/Users/mine/sources",
> metadata !3 ;; Compile unit
> }
>
> !2 is the Compile Unit, right? !3 is also wrong.
Yes. Thanks for catching this.
Fixed r108246.
-
Devang
2010 Jul 14
2
[LLVMdev] Debugging docs wrong?
On 13 July 2010 17:54, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Thanks for catching this.
> Fixed r108246.
Most welcome. ;)
Btw, the 2.6 debug information (referred from the blog) doesn't warn
users that it's deprecated, nor it links to the new info (in an
obvious manner, at least), that is completely different. That happens
with the release notes that haven't been released yet, I think i...
2010 Jul 14
0
[LLVMdev] Debugging docs wrong?
On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 13 July 2010 17:54, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes. Thanks for catching this.
>> Fixed r108246.
>
> Most welcome. ;)
>
> Btw, the 2.6 debug information (referred from the blog) doesn't warn
> users that it's deprecated, nor it links to the new info (in an
> obvious manner, at least), that is completely different. That happens
> with the release notes that haven...