Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r107202".
2010 Jun 29
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] DwarfDebug problem with line section
I updated DwarfDebug to use section offset, instead of hard coding 0,
to handle LTO properly.
r107202.
Thanks for brining this up.
-
Devang
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote:
> DW_AT_stmt_list attribute's value is a section offset to the line no
> info for current compilation unit. If there is only one compilation
> unit generated...
2010 Jun 29
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] DwarfDebug problem with line section
DW_AT_stmt_list attribute's value is a section offset to the line no
info for current compilation unit. If there is only one compilation
unit generated per .o file then it is always zero. What kind of errors
are you seeing ?
-
Devang
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Artur Pietrek <pietreka at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> While implementing debug info for our backend, we've
2010 Jun 30
0
[LLVMdev] [patch] DwarfDebug problem with line section
.... It has to be a label,
not a constant, because it is the linker who knows the correct offset.
Artur
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>wrote:
> I updated DwarfDebug to use section offset, instead of hard coding 0,
> to handle LTO properly.
> r107202.
>
> Thanks for brining this up.
> -
> Devang
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > DW_AT_stmt_list attribute's value is a section offset to the line no
> > info for current compilation unit. If there i...
2010 Jun 29
2
[LLVMdev] [patch] DwarfDebug problem with line section
Hi all,
While implementing debug info for our backend, we've noticed a problem with
debug_line section. We believe that the following code is wrong:
// DW_AT_stmt_list is a offset of line number information for this
// compile unit in debug_line section. It is always zero when only one
// compile unit is emitted in one object file.
addUInt(Die, dwarf::DW_AT_stmt_list, dwarf::DW_FORM_data4,