search for: r103439

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "r103439".

2011 Apr 13
4
[LLVMdev] Extra padding on DWARF debug info?
>> Does anybody know what the bug is in GDB that this works around? The >> workaround was added as part of r103439[1], which added support for >> multiple compilation units in one module. Does the bug ever affect >> modules with only a single compilation unit? >> > > It was not added by r103439. In fact, it was added by r32035. > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&am...
2011 Apr 13
2
[LLVMdev] Extra padding on DWARF debug info?
...Asm->EmitInt8(0); Asm->EmitInt8(0); Asm->EmitInt8(0); Asm->EmitInt8(0); Asm->OutStreamer.EmitLabel(Asm->GetTempSymbol("info_end", TheCU->getID())); Does anybody know what the bug is in GDB that this works around? The workaround was added as part of r103439[1], which added support for multiple compilation units in one module. Does the bug ever affect modules with only a single compilation unit? -Ken [1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100510/101040.html
2011 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Extra padding on DWARF debug info?
...Asm->EmitInt8(0); > Asm->EmitInt8(0); > Asm->EmitInt8(0); > Asm->OutStreamer.EmitLabel(Asm->GetTempSymbol("info_end", TheCU->getID())); > > Does anybody know what the bug is in GDB that this works around? The > workaround was added as part of r103439[1], which added support for > multiple compilation units in one module. Does the bug ever affect > modules with only a single compilation unit? > It was not added by r103439. In fact, it was added by r32035. http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=32035 Unfortunately...
2011 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Extra padding on DWARF debug info?
On Apr 13, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> Does anybody know what the bug is in GDB that this works around? The >>> workaround was added as part of r103439[1], which added support for >>> multiple compilation units in one module. Does the bug ever affect >>> modules with only a single compilation unit? >>> >> >> It was not added by r103439. In fact, it was added by r32035. >> >> http://llvm.org/vie...