Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "qxd".
Did you mean:
qid
2003 Mar 25
3
Can't reach Samba shares from Win XP Pro
...consistent problems
the other way around. Despite a couple of shares on my Linux partition,
I am just unable to do get to it. Network Neighborhood shows my
Linux/Samba server but no shares, nor can I explicitly map the share to
a Win XP logical drive.
While troubleshooting by reading Sam24hc13.qxd (an extract from an
excellent book, I might add), I found that I run into trouble trying to
use "nmblookup -B <broadcast address> <Samba machine name>". The same
command works fine if I give it the names of my two XP machines. I
somehow suspect this is the main reason why...
2006 Nov 15
2
Page() Function Timeout
...e (5) in it. After compiling I restarted the asterisk service and
tried paging again and still had the same problem.
In the CLI I get the following, which you can see the (5) is still in
there somehow.
-- Playing 'beep' (language 'en')
-- Launching MeetMe(1010553064d|mqxdw(5)) on SIP/710-09a50038
-- Created MeetMe conference 1023 for conference '1010553064d'
-- Launching MeetMe(1010553064d|mqxdw(5)) on SIP/717-09a48758
I've grep'd the entire src folder for \(5\) as well as qxd trying to
find all instances of this, and the only ones are liste...
2003 Mar 25
1
Got it working.....after a fashion
...Despite a couple of shares on my Linux partition,
>>I am just unable to do get to it. Network Neighborhood shows my
>>Linux/Samba server but no shares, nor can I explicitly map the share to
>>a Win XP logical drive.
>
>
>>While troubleshooting by reading Sam24hc13.qxd (an extract from an
>>excellent book, I might add), I found that I run into trouble trying to
>>use "nmblookup -B <broadcast address> <Samba machine name>". The same
>>command works fine if I give it the names of my two XP machines. I
>>somehow susp...
2005 Sep 19
1
Use of least-squares means, are they misleading?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Sorry for sending this question twice, but I would really like to know
your opinion on this topic.
I have been reading about the (in)convenience of using least-squares
means (a. k. a. adjusted means) in multiple comparisons (I used to
resort to them when using SAS). I even read a post in this list warning
against them, but not giving much detail.