search for: qx_initbatteri

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "qx_initbatteri".

Did you mean: qx_initbattery
2014 Jun 02
2
blazer_ser battery.high / battery.low
Hi, thanks for the reply. On 2014-05-29 05:21, Charles Lepple wrote: >> Now my questions: >> 1. should the blazer_ser's high voltage be the voltage during charging >> or right after I've unplugged it from the mains? > sounds like during charging (or more accurately, during float charging at the end of the cycle): > >
2014 Apr 29
1
blazer_ser battery.high / battery.low
Hello list, we've got a PowerWalker VI 1000E/RT LCD UPS and like to use it with NUT using the blazer_ser driver. For the blazer_ser driver to display percentage, one has to add battery.voltage.high and battery.voltage.low voltages to the ups config. Here's what I received from the powerwalker customer service: Battery-Low Voltage: 21.6VDC Battery Shutdown: 19.2VDC Now my questions: 1.
2014 Jun 02
0
blazer_ser battery.high / battery.low
On Jun 2, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Andreas Lausch / TBT wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks for the reply. > > On 2014-05-29 05:21, Charles Lepple wrote: >>> Now my questions: >>> 1. should the blazer_ser's high voltage be the voltage during charging >>> or right after I've unplugged it from the mains? >> sounds like during charging (or more
2023 Jan 17
1
PR to test for users of Qx devices (blazer and nutdrv_qx)
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> > > Cheers, > > One PR waiting to get into 2.8.1 release timeframe is https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1652 stemming from issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1279 > > The gist of it is that "battery.voltage" and "battery.charge" were not always reported
2023 Jan 17
1
PR to test for users of Qx devices (blazer and nutdrv_qx)
Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> > > Cheers, > > One PR waiting to get into 2.8.1 release timeframe is https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1652 stemming from issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1279 > > The gist of it is that "battery.voltage" and "battery.charge" were not always reported