search for: qwords

Hi, I found a mismatch between assembler & disassembler of X86: I assembled an instruction, then disassembled the output, but the result is not the same as the first original code: "add qword ptr [205163983024656], 1" vs " add qword ptr [1985229328], 1" Anybody knows what is wrong? Thanks. $ echo "ADD QWORD PTR [0xba9876543210], 0x1"|llvm-mc -assemble

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I found a mismatch between assembler & disassembler of X86: I assembled an > instruction, then disassembled the output, but the result is not the same > as the first original code: "add qword ptr [205163983024656], 1" vs " add > qword ptr [1985229328], 1" > >

I'm trying to run the example described at: http://llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html I followed the sample command line session (below, with versions numbers for everything), but gdb doesn't stop at the breakpoints as described. Any idea what is wrong? Thanks, Zach zdevito at derp:~/terra/tests$ > ~/clang+llvm-3.4-x86_64-unknown-ubuntu12.04/bin/clang -cc1 -O0 -g >

> > > >>>>> On 10/16/2016 11:16 PM, Pierre Jaury wrote: > > > >>>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I am using a dict proxy for my sieve extdata plugin to access some > > > >>>>>> fields from an SQLite database (autoreply text and other > > >

Hello, I am using a dict proxy for my sieve extdata plugin to access some fields from an SQLite database (autoreply text and other database-configured items). All tests are performed against version 2.2.25. $ dovecot --version 2.2.25 (7be1766) My configuration looks like: dict { sieve = sqlite:/etc/dovecot/pigeonhole-sieve.dict } [...] sieve_extdata_dict_uri = proxy::sieve I

Objects compiled for the MS-ABI don't conform to it! Data types beyond 64 bit MUST BE returned by the callee via the hidden first argument allocated by the caller, NOT in XMM0! Demo/proof: from this source --- llvm-bug.c --- #ifndef __clang__ typedef struct { unsigned __int64 low; unsigned __int64 high; } __uint128_t; #else __attribute__((ms_abi)) #endif __uint128_t

Hi! This does sound like a bug, we'll have look. Aki On 17.10.2016 01:26, Pierre Jaury wrote: > I dived a little bit further into the rabbit hole, up to the point where > debugging has become unpracticle but I still haven't found the root > cause for sure. > > I read most of the code for "p_strdup" based on datastack memory pools > (which are used for

Hi all, Some background: I'm working on a project to replace a custom VM with various components of llvm. We have everything running just peachy keen with one recent exception, one of our executables crashes when attempting run a JIT'd function. We have llvm building and running on 64 bit Windows and Linux, using Visual Studio 2008 on Windows and gcc on Linux, and we have the llvm

Oh duh, it used datastack pool. Try again with the attached patch? Please remember to clear the previous one out before trying. Aki > > The trace is missing some symbols, I will debug tomorrow and see where > the call comes from exactly. > > Regards, > > > On 10/17/2016 06:23 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Looking at the code, I think the bug

Hello folks, I've recently been looking at the generated code for a few functions in Chromium while investigating crashes, and I came across a curious pattern. A smallish repro case is available at https://godbolt.org/z/Dsu1WI . In that case, the function Assembler::emit_arith receives a struct (Operand) by value and passes it by value to another function. That struct is 8 bytes long, so the

While trying to isolate properly and reproduce, I was able to trigger the same bug with the following code: struct dict *dict; char* dict_uri = "proxy::sieve"; char* key = "priv/key"; char* username = "admin at domain.tld"; char* value, error; dict_drivers_register_builtin(); dict_init(dict_uri, DICT_DATA_TYPE_STRING, username,

...pdate granularity in x86 seems to be a cacheline, But this is not guaranteed by the spec. The spec only makes the following recommendation: "While not required by this specification, it is strongly recommended that host platforms guarantee that when a host CPU writes aligned DWORDs or aligned QWORDs to host memory, the update granularity observed by a PCI Express read will not be smaller than a DWORD." Thanks, Ilya

Hi! Looking at the code, I think the bug is that it just copies pointer to the value, it should, instead, duplicate the value to some memory region. Can you see if this following patch fixes it? Aki > On October 17, 2016 at 4:14 PM Pierre Jaury <pierre at jaury.eu> wrote: > > > Okay, it seems to me that the bug is due to "t_str_tabunescape" using > the unsafe

Compiling a simple automaton created by GNU bison with -O1 or -O2 resulted in the following machine code: 1300 /*-----------------------------. 1301 | yyreduce -- Do a reduction. | 1302 `-----------------------------*/ 1303 yyreduce: 1304 /* yyn is the number of a rule to reduce with. */ 1305 yylen = yyr2[yyn]; 0x0000000000400c14 <rpcalc_parse+628>: mov

Here's a new version of a patch that fixes a problem with MSVC2105 update2, but it doesn't disable any optimization, so the resulting encoding performance should be almost unaffected by this workaround. MSVC compiles abs_residual_partition_sums[partition] = (FLAC__uint32)_mm_cvtsi128_si32(mm_sum); into this: movq QWORD PTR [rsi], xmm2 while it should be movd

Update: I have been working on this all day, and I finally got it working more or less with the pattern instruction selector... However, the generated code is not very good, and I haven't implemented the expand to calls if the target does not support these FP instructions. As an example, in the following function the sub abs and compare compiles to 13 instructions! Also it has changed the

I’ve been experimenting with SEH handling in LLVM, and it seems like the unwind funclets generated by LLVM are much larger than those generated by Microsoft’s CL compiler. I used the following code as a test: void test() { MyClass x; externalFunction(); } Compiling with CL, the unwind funclet that destroys ‘x’ is just two lines of asm: lea rcx, QWORD PTR x$[rdx] jmp ??1MyClass@@QEAA at XZ

Hi everyone! I've faced a strange problem after updating to Windows 8 Consumer Preview recently. It seems that LLVM inserts 4 calls to the same function at the start of generated code. The function's disassembly (taken from nearby computer with Windows 7) is: 00000000773A0DD0 sub rsp,10h 00000000773A0DD4 mov qword ptr [rsp],r10 00000000773A0DD8 mov qword ptr

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Csaba Raduly <rcsaba at gmail.com> wrote: > Compiling a simple automaton created by GNU bison with -O1 or -O2 > resulted in the following machine code: > > 1300    /*-----------------------------. > 1301    | yyreduce -- Do a reduction.  | > 1302    `-----------------------------*/ > 1303    yyreduce: > 1304      /* yyn is the number

Hi list: I''m a young developer that need a little help with scriptaculous "Autocompleter". I work with PRADO framework (http://www.xisc.com) and PHP as a script language. Now this is a little function in JavaScript for make a AJAX call and show the results without reload the entire page. See below: 1 function makeRequest(url,element) { 2 var http_request = false; 3 if