Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "quotelabel".
2015 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...little time
> :)
>
This is why I did so much documentation work when in college. The docs
build much faster.
>
> Regarding item 8. I don't know if anyone is using "": in the wild so
> fixing the implementation might make sense. If not the documentation (e.g.
> the QuoteLabel comment) should be updated to be in line with the
> implementation.
>
FYI the textual IR doesn't have a compatibility guarantee (we try not to
egregiously change it, but users don't expect .ll to work across versions).
>
> I only included item 9 since I stumbled upon it once...
2015 Jan 28
4
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...a compilation and let it run throughout the
night. My laptop (x61s) is 8 years old by know, so compiling LLVM takes
a little time :)
Regarding item 8. I don't know if anyone is using "": in the wild so
fixing the implementation might make sense. If not the documentation
(e.g. the QuoteLabel comment) should be updated to be in line with the
implementation.
I only included item 9 since I stumbled upon it once cross-referencing
the source code with the language specification. Bitrot for a project of
this size is to be expected.
I'm still very interested to hear about the items r...
2015 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...0 of the LLVM source code). Is it
used somewhere?
* Item 8 - quoted labels
A comment in lib/AsmParser/LLLexer.cpp (once again, release version
3.5.0 of the LLVM source code) describes quoted labels using the
following regexp (e.g. at least one character between the double quotes):
> /// QuoteLabel "[^"]+":
In contrast the reference implementation accepts quoted labels with zero
or more characters between the double quotes. Which is to be trusted?
The comment makes more sense as the variable name would effectively be
blank otherwise.
* Item 9 - undocumented calling...
2015 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...ster.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regarding item 8. I don't know if anyone is using "": in the wild so
>>>>> fixing the implementation might make sense. If not the documentation
>>>>> (e.g.
>>>>> the QuoteLabel comment) should be updated to be in line with the
>>>>> implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI the textual IR doesn't have a compatibility guarantee (we try not
>>>> to
>>>> egregiously change it, but users don&...