search for: quota_move_requires_check

...led >> > dovecot, but I can still move messages into the over-quota namespace. >> >> How about this updated patch? >> >> > Nope, still lets me move messages into the over-quota namespace. > > Both these are true in quota_check: > > ctx->moving > quota_move_requires_check > > > > >> > Out of curiosity, in the Quota wiki page, it mentions that 'in theory >> there >> > could be e.g. "user quota" and "domain quota" roots'. That's also super >> > interesting to me. Does anyone have any experien...

On 24 Nov 2016, at 9.33, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 23 Nov 2016, at 0.49, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If I move messages between namespaces, it appears to ignore the quotas >> I've >>> set on them.

...patch! Esp on a Weds night. I applied and rerolled > > dovecot, but I can still move messages into the over-quota namespace. > > How about this updated patch? > > Nope, still lets me move messages into the over-quota namespace. Both these are true in quota_check: ctx->moving quota_move_requires_check > > Out of curiosity, in the Quota wiki page, it mentions that 'in theory > there > > could be e.g. "user quota" and "domain quota" roots'. That's also super > > interesting to me. Does anyone have any experience with that? I.e. any > >...

...rk Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> How about this updated patch? >>> >>> >> Nope, still lets me move messages into the over-quota namespace. >> >> Both these are true in quota_check: >> >> ctx->moving >> quota_move_requires_check .. > Anything else I can try? I'm not sure how the logic in the quota system > works, so I'm not sure what to suggest. What's the gist of the patch (i.e. > what's it trying to do that it wasn't before)? > > If I can get a handle on that, I can start littering thi...