search for: quirkier

Hi, I propose to make function inliner parameters adjustable for specific target. Currently function inlining pass appears to be target-agnostic with various constants for calculating call cost hardcoded. While it works reasonably well for general purpose CPUs, some quirkier targets like NVPTX would benefit from target-specific tuning. Currently it appears that there are two things that need to be done: * add Inliner preferences to TargetTransformInfo in a way similar to how we customize loop unrolling. Use it to provide inliner with target-specific thresholds and ot...

...make function inliner parameters adjustable for specific > > target. > > > > Currently function inlining pass appears to be target-agnostic with > > various constants for calculating call cost hardcoded. While it > > works reasonably well for general purpose CPUs, some quirkier > > targets like NVPTX would benefit from target-specific tuning. > > > > > > Currently it appears that there are two things that need to be done: > > > > > > * add Inliner preferences to TargetTransformInfo in a way similar to > > how we customize lo...

...make function inliner parameters adjustable for specific > > target. > > > > Currently function inlining pass appears to be target-agnostic with > > various constants for calculating call cost hardcoded. While it > > works reasonably well for general purpose CPUs, some quirkier > > targets like NVPTX would benefit from target-specific tuning. > > > > > > Currently it appears that there are two things that need to be done: > > > > > > * add Inliner preferences to TargetTransformInfo in a way similar to > > how we customize lo...

Hello I am going to try the new Digium Fax for Asterisk product. I'm planning to connect fax machines to Asterisk (currently 1.6.0.9) via T.38 ATAs. I'm looking at Grandstream HT502 or Linksys SPA2102 ATAs. If anyone has any experience with these devices, or other recommendations, I would be grateful if you could share your experiences. Regards Ian