Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "quick_n_dirty".
Did you mean:
quick'n'dirty
2007 Feb 05
1
tunneling support for PF_UNIX sockets
...X sockets, socket can be made accissible to the user only (by
locating it to 700 directory).
Questions:
3. Is there a way to achieve same goals with current ssh version?
4. Is there a reason not to do this?
5. Is there a already available naming convention to support different
address families?
Quick_n_dirty way would be prefixing host_address with some predefined
"illegal" character (e.g. '#'), to signal the AF_UNIX address. But I see
that general, expandable naming convention would give more. One could
e.g. define an address space of "AF_EXEC", which would execute program...