search for: questoms

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "questoms".

Did you mean: questions
2020 Jul 14
5
Multiple documents in one test file
...er we can add a separate extractor utility: ``` # RUN: extract bb %s | llvm-mc - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=BB or # RUN: extract bb %s -o %t.bb # RUN: llvm-mc %t.bb 2>&1 | FileCheck %t.bb ``` The advantage is its versatility. The downside is somewhat verbose syntax. Some questoms: 1. What do people think of the two approaches? An in-utility option vs a standalone utility. 2. For llvm-mc, if we go with an option, is there a better name than --doc-id? David Blaikie proposed --asm-id (This is my personal preference, trading 30+ lines in a utility for simpler syntax) 3. If...
2020 Jul 14
2
Multiple documents in one test file
...//t.bb> | llvm-mc - 2>&1 | FileCheck > %t.bb <http://t.bb> > > (could even make it a bit shorter for convenience - 'ex' or something) >   > > The advantage is its versatility. The downside is somewhat verbose > syntax. > > > Some questoms: > > 1. What do people think of the two approaches? An in-utility option > vs a standalone utility. > 2. For llvm-mc, if we go with an option, is there a better name than > --doc-id? David Blaikie proposed --asm-id >    (This is my personal preference, trading...
2020 Jul 14
2
Multiple documents in one test file
...RUN: extract bb %s | llvm-mc - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=BB > > or > > # RUN: extract bb %s -o %t.bb > # RUN: llvm-mc %t.bb 2>&1 | FileCheck %t.bb > ``` > > The advantage is its versatility. The downside is somewhat verbose syntax. > > > Some questoms: > > 1. What do people think of the two approaches? An in-utility option vs a > standalone utility. > 2. For llvm-mc, if we go with an option, is there a better name than > --doc-id? David Blaikie proposed --asm-id > (This is my personal preference, trading 30+ lines in a utili...