search for: queasy

Hi, we are experiencing significant performance degradation after live migration of hvm domains in Xen 4.0 (SLES11 SP1): after live migration the performance is dropping to less than 90%. I did a backport of cs 23420-23423 and the performance is okay now. I would like to request to include these changesets in 4.0 and 4.1. The backport is quite trivial, I can send patches if you are willing to

...avoid problems, or is it a mix of the two? I haven't even started to play with the mini browser; that looks like it is going to have some serious potential, too. Now for a side note: kxmleditor *rocks* for editing these damn Polycom XML configuration files! It almost makes me feel a little queasy, like I'm editing the Windows Registry. :-) -A.

...uld never be used, like strcpy, strcat, etc., reveals a lot of it. I fear I fear. Has anyone flung pathology at IAX2 to see if it stands up to malformed packets? (This is always an issue when you have a protocol that only a small number of programs use ...) I hope I'm wrong, but I have a very queasy feeling ... [We already know that H.323 is not being looked after, security-wise ...]

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:58:46 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Currently all config space fields are of the type __uXX. > This confuses people and some drivers (notably vdpa) > access them using CPU endian-ness - which only > works well for legacy or LE platforms. > > Update virtio_cread/virtio_cwrite macros to allow __virtioXX > and

I'm baaaaack. :-) I've managed to implement a suggestion from Hans Morten Kind from this list that seems to have stopped the crashing. However, my hack - commenting out a call to i_unreached() - makes me queasy because I have no idea of the ramifications of it (I don't habitually code, myself). So I wanted to lay it out for y'all in case this is a problem that you feel should be looked at. So, here's my situation. Using dovecot-1.0.rc10 downloaded from dovecot.org. Built an RPM locally on...

----- Original Message ----- > On 9/17/2013 2:43 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > > That would depend on how this attribute was used; it could only be > > used by a pass that did actually understand what those side > > effects were (like the loop vectorizer understanding that, if > > errno is ignored, then vectorizing cos() is legal). I don't object > > to

Looking to cluster an FTP server. Right now we do a mix of stuff where we use a few separate servers linked through various hacks, that utilizes VSFTPd heavily for hundreds of television station news websites, where, of course, the current weather maps get uploaded from everywhere, all day, from NOAA and the like. I'd like to move from the current setup to something that's more HA

Hi. I am writing an application that has a lot of boolean conditional display logic, like this: <% if user.description then %> <p class="css_class"><%= user.description %></p> <% end %> Often the displayed content is more complex than the above, and to clean up my views I am trying to pull a lot of this sort of thing into partials. However, the problem

So, i'm working through the last of miniscule gvn optimizations, and one of the things that gets tested is whether it will eliminate non-volatile loads in favor of ohter non-volatile loads when there are volatile loads in the way. I.E. define i32 @test1(i32* nocapture %p, i32* nocapture %q) { entry: %x = load i32, i32* %p %0 = load volatile i32, i32* %q %y = load i32, i32* %p %add =

hello, i wondered if it would not be interesting to have some filters function in puppet like filter_integer(), filter_prelregex, filter_text, filter_email or such so we can validate and make our defines a little more foolproof :) i particulary see filter_regex as usefull in quite a lot of exec that manipulates text files. What do you think about this ? -- Cordialement, Ghislain

Hi Chandler, This is a high-level review of the new WIP `PassManager` infrastructure. For those that haven't dug into Chandler's commits, here's a very high-level overview (assuming IIUC): - The driver supports simple declarative syntax for specifying passes to run. E.g., `module(a,b,function(c,d),e)` runs module passes `a` and `b`, then function passes `c` and `d` for

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > Agreed. But note that the standards are set long before that... ??? By "standard" what do you mean. ??? Linux's history has been notorious for variance from ANSI, NIST, POSIX and GNU standards. Yes, far less than Microsoft and even some UNIX vendors, but there are still major issues today with this. When developers try

Config space endian-ness is currently a mess: fields are not tagged with the correct endian-ness so it's easy to make mistakes like instanciating config space in native endian-ness. The following patches adding sparse tagging are currently in my tree. Lightly tested. As a follow-up, I plan to add new APIs that handle modern config space in a more efficient way (bypassing the version check).