Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "qualcom".
Did you mean:
qualcomm
2017 Dec 01
0
[PATCH 02/13] fbdev: add remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers()
...to synchronize trees (and we have to do that a few times per release cycle
or drivers simply stop compiling). Where's the upside of taking this
driver into staging?
One is users, but ime for soc display drivers usually everything else is
in worse shape (e.g. even great drivers like the one for qualcom must be
tested on some vendor tree because critical core bits are missing in
upstream), so "more users" is not the good reason. And it's clearly not
"more developers", because no time to clean things up. So what exactly is
the good reason to put this into staging instead of...
2017 Nov 30
4
[PATCH 02/13] fbdev: add remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers()
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:56:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:30:30PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > >
2017 Nov 30
4
[PATCH 02/13] fbdev: add remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers()
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:56:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:30:30PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:32:38PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:22:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:52:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > >