search for: qperf

...Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0106 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0106.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e3b7e6c0aa51586886057885c13080db1e40390a330d1fd09bcea3315de30629 qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 2455f9f67e6814b7c35201434ab82c5f40cab9aa7852b66c2cb56622a1a07fb5 qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 3f64cfd67d2d070b0146800be906dd6c6b881e10b81f67270356248d358b218f qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughe...

...Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0106 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0106.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: e3b7e6c0aa51586886057885c13080db1e40390a330d1fd09bcea3315de30629 qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 2455f9f67e6814b7c35201434ab82c5f40cab9aa7852b66c2cb56622a1a07fb5 qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 3f64cfd67d2d070b0146800be906dd6c6b881e10b81f67270356248d358b218f qperf-0.4.6-3.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughe...

...in] 0-rpc-transport/rdma: rdma.management: failed to connect with remote QP I see this when I run RDMA over Ethernet using ROCEE RPMs, but when I run over Infiniband using RHEL 6.2-, it runs fine. On the same Ethernet configuration, Gluster/TCP runs fine, NFS/RDMA runs fine as does AMQP app. But qperf and rping utilities fail in the same way. Firmware on the HCAs is not the latest, is it worth risk to upgrade? I went into debugger and found line where qperf fails, it's near line 2056 in rdma.c in qperf sources (qperf-debuginfo, I did Makefile) (gdb) 2088 } else if (dev->trans =...

...ut I can''t seem to find them in email), they were a fair bit better than Gen3. With IPOIB, you want connected mode and a large 32Kb+ MTU for max bandwidth, 1Gbyte/sec or more should be possible with Gen 4. Here are some of my original test results on my Opteron System with Gen3 cards: #qperf 192.168.10.160 tcp_bw tcp_lat tcp_bw: bw = 866 MB/sec tcp_lat: latency = 30.8 us # qperf 192.168.10.160 rc_bi_bw rc_bi_bw: bw = 1.71 GB/sec The second result is bi directional, Gen4 on PCI-E V2 should get quite a lot better. Rob -----Original Message----- From: Jan Ruff...

Forgot to mention that I was using CentOS7.3 and GlusterFS 3.10.3 that is the latest available. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Hatazaki, Takao Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 2:32 AM To: gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: [Gluster-users] Is transport=rdma tested with "stripe"? Hi, I have 2 servers with Mellanox

Hey, if you haven't started already, now would be a good time to begin translating the release notes which are already on the wiki. We're going to begin QA tomorrow and will finish the release notes from our findings in QA. So if you now begin and watch the release notes page, you'll just have to put the changes into the already translated stuff. Thanks in advance (and for the work

Hi, I have 2 servers with Mellanox InfiniBand FDR hardware/software installed. A volume with "replica 2 transport rdma" works (create on servers, mount and test on clients) ok. A volume with "stripe 2 transport tcp" works ok, too. A volume with "stripe 2 transport rdma" created ok, and mounted ok on a client, but writing a file caused "endpoint not

looks like your rdma is not functional did you tested with qperf? On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Hatazaki, Takao <takao.hatazaki at hpe.com> wrote: > Forgot to mention that I was using CentOS7.3 and GlusterFS 3.10.3 that is > the latest available. > > > > *From:* gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces@ &gt...

...n-2.4.3-27.el5.src.rpm > > -python-pyblock-0.26-3.el5.src.rpm > +python-pyblock-0.26-4.el5.src.rpm > > -python-virtinst-0.300.2-12.el5.src.rpm > +python-virtinst-0.400.3-4.el5.src.rpm > > -qlvnictools-0.0.1-10.el5.src.rpm > +qlvnictools-0.0.1-11.el5.src.rpm > > -qperf-0.4.1-2.el5.src.rpm > +qperf-0.4.4-3.el5.src.rpm > > -rdesktop-1.4.1-6.src.rpm > +rdesktop-1.6.0-2.src.rpm > > -readline-5.1-1.1.src.rpm > +readline-5.1-3.el5.src.rpm > > -redhat-release-5Client-5.3.0.3.src.rpm > +redhat-release-5Client-5.4.0.2.src.rpm > > -r...

In IRC today, someone who was hitting that same IB performance ceiling that occasionally gets reported had this to say [11:50] <nissim> first, I ran fedora which is not supported by Mellanox OFED distro [11:50] <nissim> so I moved to CentOS 6.3 [11:51] <nissim> next I removed all distibution related infiniband rpms and build the latest OFED package [11:52] <nissim>

...================================================================================================== >From johnny at centos.org Tue Nov 26 13:32:45 2013 From: johnny at centos.org (Johnny Hughes) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:32:45 +0000 Subject: [CentOS-CR-announce] CESA-2013:1661 Moderate CentOS 6 qperf Update Message-ID: <20131126133245.GA26140 at n04.lon1.karan.org> CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1661 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1661.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha2...