search for: ql_dbg_disc

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ql_dbg_disc".

2016 Dec 08
3
[PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
On 12/07/16 21:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:21:47AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Additionally, there are notable exceptions to the rule that most drivers >> are endian-clean, e.g. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx. I would appreciate it if it >> would remain possible to check such drivers with sparse without enabling >> endianness checks. Have you
2016 Dec 08
3
[PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
On 12/07/16 21:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 05:21:47AM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> Additionally, there are notable exceptions to the rule that most drivers >> are endian-clean, e.g. drivers/scsi/qla2xxx. I would appreciate it if it >> would remain possible to check such drivers with sparse without enabling >> endianness checks. Have you
2016 Dec 08
0
[PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
...said it should be easy? Maybe this change will be enough to motivate the maintainers. Here's a minor buglet for you as a motivator: if (ct_rsp->header.response != cpu_to_be16(CT_ACCEPT_RESPONSE)) { ql_dbg(ql_dbg_disc + ql_dbg_buffer, vha, 0x2077, "%s failed rejected request on port_id: %02x%02x%02x Compeltion status 0x%x, response 0x%x\n", routine, vha->d_id.b.domain, vha->d_id.b.area, vha...
2016 Dec 09
2
[PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
...t;Maybe this change will be enough to motivate the maintainers. > >Here's a minor buglet for you as a motivator: > > if (ct_rsp->header.response != > cpu_to_be16(CT_ACCEPT_RESPONSE)) { > ql_dbg(ql_dbg_disc + ql_dbg_buffer, vha, 0x2077, > "%s failed rejected request on port_id: %02x%02x%02x Compeltion status 0x%x, response 0x%x\n", > routine, vha->d_id.b.domain, > vha->d_id...
2016 Dec 09
2
[PATCH] linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
...t;Maybe this change will be enough to motivate the maintainers. > >Here's a minor buglet for you as a motivator: > > if (ct_rsp->header.response != > cpu_to_be16(CT_ACCEPT_RESPONSE)) { > ql_dbg(ql_dbg_disc + ql_dbg_buffer, vha, 0x2077, > "%s failed rejected request on port_id: %02x%02x%02x Compeltion status 0x%x, response 0x%x\n", > routine, vha->d_id.b.domain, > vha->d_id...