search for: qby

I updated samba to samba-2.0.7-4 (RedHat RPM). That didn't help. I changed the file ownership to user.group from user.user. That didn't help. I changed the file permissions to -rwxrwxr-- as you had suggested, and then it worked. (QuickBooks 99 needs *both* the file permissions set as noted *and* the ownership also.) However, when everyone closes QuickBooks the QBI file is deleted, and

The second instance of Quickbooks shows a "file may be corrupt" message. 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBW Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH / MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBI Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 It works on Windows - just copied the same file to a network mapped windows

Robert Dal Santo wrote: > Is there any work underway to get Samba to support OPLOCKS? I know > they are difficult to implement but I'm faced with a decisions now to buy an > NT box (Ugh!) or do a lot of messing around to get this application > to perform decently. The application in questions takes around 5 > hours to do a taks without OPLOCKS and around an hour to do the

Hello, I upgraded from Samba 3.0.2 to 3.0.4 on my Redhat Enterprise system and am now seeing something very strange with POSIX ACL?s. We have several shared directories setup with per-directory group permissions (In other words each directory has its own group in active directory). This way if we want to give a user access to a directory we just add them to the group. After upgrading too 3.0.4

Hello, I am having to major issues with Mac clients on our samba server. One has to do with how the Mac vs. the PC locks files and the other has to do with a very slow connection to one of our larger shares. 1.) File locking issue: I am having a strange problem occur with shared excel and word files being opened by multiple users. The problem appears to be a result of a Mac opening the file

Debian and Samba Teams: I'm having a really weird problem with Samba 3.0Beta2+RC4 on my Debian Sarge (testing) system with Quickbooks Pro 2002 multi-user version. The version of my question is: Does anybody know what the proper global, share, and permissions settings should be to support multi-user Quickbooks on a Samba share? The Long Version: The Quickbooks data-file resides on it's

Has anyone seen this error? is it a bug? if not then what am I doing wrong with the compile? I downloaded the lastest CVS, applied the transgaming patch, it built fine and installed fine. # wine /mnt/hda1/windows/sol.exe wine: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/local/lib/libntdll.so: undefined symbol: wine_ldt_copy thanks heath Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/

Hi there, Can somebody please explain to me why Samba 3 requires 'oplocks = no' on shares for programs like Quickbooks to operate properly with multiple users, where Samba 2 didn't? Without this option, Quickbooks will complain about file corruption when a second user tries to open a file. This option, however, makes the particular share that the option is present in _very_ slow

All, I'm running the latest stable version of SerNet-Samba on a Debian Sarge box (I switched from the traditional Samba package for certain reasons which I won't delve into here), but I've come across a serious issue. Every day, the Samba processes become so numerous that the server begins acting really flaky. That is to say, there are so many smbd -D processes that the server

...7JJ09$l-qacMv*3ZXo4O<n z?6slh?w=vhPwp^8N_{R1J!!x&5Q0&X4Z=63x!Li^^DS0C6xTL5Rm4^!XEHlF1DIag z0!CWC835DT1;|*~2Fn^BMn*DYBJa5b2QLcr+}6%9Ri*A8WH~JlDD|lN$(;ssfJs!S z_x$Umi|r?)q+^8VwJ#`XN!s-XXt16Ih$1c!F85rpIsMvMQSIQSW*s|YR*OKuBuEvp zYg at F2s1+%3q?56zL1gR5bROmhdHbzj4NgKlHJoLPPt9dNG4NA*-<4wW?34qbyuQuP z!S!wMb6oPxf%6c)#83I{%z(s+=kb>yIN!_+{0<6HJ}!>D`s{_b$Sntpi3ze4;*Zo@ z&T6d5K;}n<Y=|N5n_7^(uw6F)glabD`wZ3m7vejCO?%_7x^ydKE+pH8FimOIK6JOb z9<xoiHD$4nRB1Qe(?BTzwfK;Qz36ab$??dBzkg~<)bD4*3fqc?UdSrL>!wI$>uL*H z7Hcl0q*U&5a=`(iDjaAp)ymU98SY3XC13!DLyQ?N83VH*fSiQptbqbq5aW|c-...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking