search for: q7

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If I'm going from .wav --> .ogg -q9 --> .ogg -q7 do I suffer any ill effects or is it just like going from .wav --> .ogg -q7 ?? I ask because I think I want to go down a bit more as the size of the files are around 10mb or so. I can get them from source again and go straight to - -q7 if need be. - -- Robert Cole -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE...

...ire(foreign) > q1 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q1.rec') > q2 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q2.rec') > q3 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q3.rec') > q4 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q4.rec') > q5 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q5.rec') > q6 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q6.rec') > q7 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q7.rec') > q8 = read.epiinfo('Dados/Q8.rec') > > juntos = merge(q1,q2,q3,q4,q5,q6,q7,q8) > > But it didn't work. Any suggestions? > > Thank you. > > -------------------------------------- > Silvano Cesar da Costa > Departame...

...ss 16 samples at a time */ + "movs %5, %3, lsr #4;\n" + "beq .celt_fir1_process16_done_%=;\n" + + ".celt_fir1_process16_%=:\n" + /* Load 16 x values in q0, q1 lanes */ + "vld1.16 {q0-q1}, [%0]!;\n" + + /* Init four 32 bits sum in q7, q8, q9, q10 lanes */ + "vshll.s16 q7, d0, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + "vshll.s16 q8, d1, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + "vshll.s16 q9, d2, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + "vshll.s16 q10, d3, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + + /* Make previous samples vector for MAC in q5, q6 lanes */...

...ss 16 samples at a time */ + "movs %5, %3, lsr #4;\n" + "beq .celt_fir1_process16_done_%=;\n" + + ".celt_fir1_process16_%=:\n" + /* Load 16 x values in q0, q1 lanes */ + "vld1.16 {q0-q1}, [%0]!;\n" + + /* Init four 32 bits sum in q7, q8, q9, q10 lanes */ + "vshll.s16 q7, d0, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + "vshll.s16 q8, d1, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + "vshll.s16 q9, d2, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + "vshll.s16 q10, d3, %[SIGSHIFT];\n" + + /* Make previous samples vector for MAC in q5, q6 lanes */...

...lity settings ......... I use q8, because: - I was able to ABX some test samples up to q4.99 - at q8 Ogg is still around 3.5x smaller than lossless - it sounds perfect to me!! I was just courious to know if anyone out there is able to distinguish from the original (ABX) Vorbis 1.0 at around q8 (or q7 to q9) on "NORMAL MUSIC" (not special test samples)?? What about q5 to q7? Thank you all. Bostjan <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@x...

...t; + " subs %[remainder], %[remainder], #4\n" + " vmul.f32 q0, q4, q8\n" + " bne 4f\n" + " b 5f\n" + "1:" + " vld1.32 {q4, q5}, [%[b]]!\n" + " vld1.32 {q8, q9}, [%[a]]!\n" + " vld1.32 {q6, q7}, [%[b]]!\n" + " vld1.32 {q10, q11}, [%[a]]!\n" + " subs %[len], %[len], #16\n" + " vmul.f32 q0, q4, q8\n" + " vmul.f32 q1, q5, q9\n" + " vmul.f32 q2, q6, q10\n" + " vmul.f32 q3, q7, q11\n" + " beq 3f\...

....7 0.0e+00 Q1 <--- G param2 0.79 0.065 12.1 0.0e+00 Q2 <--- G param3 0.63 0.073 8.5 0.0e+00 Q3 <--- G param4 0.74 0.066 11.2 0.0e+00 Q4 <--- G param6 0.81 0.068 11.9 0.0e+00 Q6 <--- G param7 0.65 0.060 11.0 0.0e+00 Q7 <--- G param9 0.60 0.059 10.1 0.0e+00 Q9 <--- G param10 0.64 0.065 9.9 0.0e+00 Q10 <--- G param11 0.72 0.054 13.3 0.0e+00 Q11 <--- G param12 0.59 0.063 9.3 0.0e+00 Q12 <--- G param13 0.61 0.069 8.7 0.0e+00 Q13 <--- G...

..., $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 80B %3:tgpr = tLDRpci %const.0, 14, $noreg :: (load 4 from constant-pool) 96B $r0 = COPY %0:tgpr 112B $r1 = COPY %1:tgpr 128B $r2 = COPY %2:tgpr 144B tBLXr 14, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp 160B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 176B ADJCAL...

If I'm understanding what's going on in this test correctly, what's happening is: * ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall prefers indirect calls when a function is called at least 3 times in minsize * In thumb 1 (without -fno-omit-frame-pointer) we have effectively only 3 callee-saved registers (r4-r6) * The function has three arguments, so those three plus the register we need to hold the

Hi I was surprised with size of Theora files and thought of feedback. Following 1minute duration Theora and Xvid files were made from a y4m file. The resolution is 1280x720: 1. Xvid 17MB 2. Ogg/Theora Q7 31MB 3. Ogg/Theora Q8 38MB 4. Ogg/Theora Q9 49MB 5. Ogg/Theora Q10 61MB The Xvid file was made using mencoder by 2 passes with following options: bitrate=2500:autoaspect:chroma_opt:vhq=4:bvhq=1:quant_type=mpeg:pass=1 The encoder_example was used to create Ogg/Theora files. It was noted y4...

Hallo, Following the tips found at https://calomel.org/nut_ups.html I was trying to make NUT operate "APC Back UPS CS-350". The device introduces itself as: #v+ ugen0 at uhub0 port 1 "American Power Conversion Back-UPS CS 350 FW:807.q7.I USB FW:q7" rev 1.10/0.06 addr 2 #v- My config: #v+ [apc] driver = usbhid-ups port = /dev/ugen0.00 pollfreq = 60 desc = "Back UPS CS-350" #v- Unfortunately, when I'm trying to start UPS driver, it's complaining: #v+ # usbhid-ups -a a...

Hallo, Following the tips found at https://calomel.org/nut_ups.html I was trying to make NUT operate "APC Back UPS CS-350". The device introduces itself as: #v+ ugen0 at uhub0 port 1 "American Power Conversion Back-UPS CS 350 FW:807.q7.I USB FW:q7" rev 1.10/0.06 addr 2 #v- My config: #v+ [apc] driver = usbhid-ups port = /dev/ugen0.00 pollfreq = 60 desc = "Back UPS CS-350" #v- Unfortunately, when I'm trying to start UPS driver, it's complaining: #v+ # usbhid-ups -a a...

...te -DDDDD debug info, but just because of that I can't get it to do a segfault. So until I can, has things changed in the development version, that might have fixed this? Network UPS Tools: New USB/HID UPS driver 0.28 (2.0.4) Detected a UPS: American Power Conversion/Back-UPS CS 500 FW:808.q7.I USB FW:q7 Using subdriver: APC/CyberPower HID 0.9

..., $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 80B %3:tgpr = tLDRpci %const.0, 14, $noreg :: (load 4 from constant-pool) 96B $r0 = COPY %0:tgpr 112B $r1 = COPY %1:tgpr 128B $r2 = COPY %2:tgpr 144B tBLXr 14, $noreg, %3:tgpr, <regmask $lr $d8 $d9 $d10 $d11 $d12 $d13 $d14 $d15 $q4 $q5 $q6 $q7 $r4 $r5 $r6 $r7 $r8 $r9 $r10 $r11 $s16 $s17 $s18 $s19 $s20 $s21 $s22 $s23 $s24 $s25 $s26 $s27 and 35 more...>, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $r0, implicit $r1, implicit $r2, implicit-def $sp 160B ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, 14, $noreg, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp 176B ADJCAL...

...lexibility is more "there" for the vorbis format, including players, tagging comments (lyrics in the comments - killer idea!), etc.... However, I am a bit worried about everything I see on testing/tuning/optimizing for higher bitrate encoding. I am wanting to do lossy archiving at a q7 level, and my music tastes range all over the place but get as dynamic as hard-techno-industrial stuff. Will vorbis let me down with music like this at a 220-300 kbps level? Sorry if this has been beat to death elsewhere - I searched on hydrogenaudio and googled a bit and everything points to...

Hello, I have a table (1) of the form q1 q3 q4 q8 q9 A 5 2 0 1 3 B 2 0 2 4 4 I have another table (2): q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 q8 q9 C 10 7 4 2 6 9 3 1 2 I would like to divide the numbers in table (1) by the number of the appropriate column in table (2): q1 q3 q4 q8 q9 A 5/10 2/4 0/2 1/1 3/2 B 2/10 0/4 2/2 4/1 4/2 The result would look lie this: q1 q3 q4 q8...

Hello, could you please have a look at this code posted on godbolt.org: https://godbolt.org/z/O-O-Q7 The problem is that inside the compute function, only the first loop vectorizes while the rest copies of it don't. But if I remove any of the for loops, then the rest vectorize successfully. Could you please confirm that this is a bug, otherwise give me more insight on why the vectorization fa...

...e student, as shown below: Lastname Firstname CATALOG_NBR Email StudentID EMPLID Start 1 alastname afirstname 1213 *@uark.edu 10295236 # 12/2/2008 2 anotherlastname anotherfirstname 1213 **@uark.edu ## 10295236 9/3/2008 Xattempts Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 Q19 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Q20 Q21 Q22 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q26 Q27 Q28 Q29 Q30 Q31 Q32 Score Form CRSE_GRADE_OFF 1 0 0 0...

...o start encoding my CD collection, and I'm not sure what to use. Do I use the still current v1.0, or am I better off using a newer build? Also, I've started to notice mention of versions 1.0.1 and 1.1 in these mailing lists. Are these worth holding out for? I'll probably encode at about Q7, and am using Windows (though I'm happy with command line tools). Any help appreciated. Regards, Toonie. <p>----------------------------------------- Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/ <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: ht...

From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha at ti.com> I optimized Speex resampler for NEON capable ARM CPUs. The first patch should speed up resampling on any platform that can spare the increased memory usage. It would be nice to have these merged to the master branch. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help the the merge. The patches have been rebased on top of master branch in