search for: q268

...t client that renders as markdown) > * Add/check existence of [component] tag > > Alternatively, we could make an upstream feature request > >From what I can tell, upstream doesn't seem /that/ interested in it being any more than a one-off thing: https://secure.phabricator.com/Q268 https://secure.phabricator.com/T12276 https://secure.phabricator.com/T11864 Jon > Michael > > Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 11:16 Uhr schrieb Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > > > Can we fix this in reviews.llvm.org's fork of phab? > >...

> On 19 Jul 2016, at 04:18, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We had a long thread about that a few weeks (months?) ago: the conclusion (as I remember) was roughly a guideline to “always start a new revision to have a proper mailing-list thread starting with context (i.e. patch description)” > (and my dissident minority opinion that it is only

Can we fix this in reviews.llvm.org's fork of phab? https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/blob/cac3dc4983c3671ba4ec841aac8efac10744a80c/src/applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php Seems straightforward(-ish) to drop the relevant fields there, that way `arc land` automatically DTRT. Jon On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 11:30 PM Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev