search for: pyqt5k

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "pyqt5k".

Did you mean: pyqt5
2016 Mar 10
2
Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > Looks like installing openshot 2.x on C7 isn't as trivial as one > might wish. it requires PyQt5k, which isn't in centos repos, nor in > epel, nux, or elrepo. googling indicates it's hard to build on C7. > It is not trivial at all. The best way to handle this will be to find the required packages in Fedora and rebuild them. At least that is what I'm planning to do... Akemi
2016 Mar 10
2
Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > wrote: > > > I'm interested in trying out the new OpenShot beta (2.06) on CentOS 7. > > Openshot requires Python3. > > > > so I look at available packages where I find a bunchof python3 packages > > as well
2016 Mar 10
0
Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??
.... I wonder if (some of??) those python3 > packages are compatible with python34? it would seem that unless that > is the case, that python34 would be less useful due to lack of various > features. Looks like installing openshot 2.x on C7 isn't as trivial as one might wish. it requires PyQt5k, which isn't in centos repos, nor in epel, nux, or elrepo. googling indicates it's hard to build on C7. :-( -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ---------------------------- Do you not know? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, t...
2016 Mar 11
0
Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??
...-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Akemi Yagi > Sent: den 10 mars 2016 20:27 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7?? > > > > > Looks like installing openshot 2.x on C7 isn't as trivial as one > > might wish. it requires PyQt5k, which isn't in centos repos, nor in > > epel, nux, or elrepo. googling indicates it's hard to build on C7. > > > > It is not trivial at all. The best way to handle this will be to find the > required packages in Fedora and rebuild them. At least that is what I'm &...