search for: pyinotify

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "pyinotify".

2007 Aug 23
4
can rsync scan files only with mtime since T?
Hi I have a file system that contains millions of small files. Since I backup it everyday with rsync using slow WAN link, I think it will be nice that if rsync can do this: An option that let rsync only check with remote rsync daemon about local files that has last modification time newer than one day ago (so is modified since yesterday backup). This can greatly reduce the WAN traffic. Is this
2009 Oct 16
3
Nice little performance improvement
Hi, In my situation I'm using rsync to backup a server with (currently) about 570,000 files. These are all little files and maybe .1% of them change or new ones are added in any 15 minute period. I've split the main tree up so rsync can run on sub sub directories of the main tree. It does each of these sub sub directories sequentially. I would have liked to run some of these in
2012 Aug 13
1
Odd issue with fail2ban
We're seeing on a few of our servers - and sometimes it's only occasionally on some of those - where fail2ban's running happily, AFAIK, but there's an attack (from China, Brazil, etc) on ssh, and they don't seem to be banned; I see many, many sorries for wrong username or password. It *seems* to work again once restarted. mark
2007 Dec 02
2
Bidirectional rsync with "trash" support
Hello everybody, I was thinking about a special script to be done with rsync, when I realized my needs might have been common enough to have already been fulfilled by somebody else through a script or by some backup software. I have a folder I share between two computers of mine, A and B. What i want is to be able to keep it in full sync. If a file is added in A, it should be added to B when
2012 Oct 17
2
CentOS 6.3 - fail2ban not working properly + workaround
I recall others on this list are using fail2ban to block brute force login attempts. Packages are from the EPEL repo, so I'm just sharing some knowledge here. For about two months now I've had a CentOS 6.3 box (web host) in production that occasionally is ftp brute forced. Oddly enough fail2ban wasn't nabbing the perpetrators. I found that the iptables chain for VSFTP isn't