search for: pw_expire

The references to pw_expire and pw_change in pwcopy() in misc.c cause compilation errors at least on solaris. How about doing a memcpy of the whole structure and only explicitly setting those that need xstrdup? That would work on openbsd and everywhere else. - Dave Dykstra --- misc.c.O Thu Jun 21 11:35:28 2001 +++ misc.c...

...og.h> #define LOGIN_CAP +#define _PATH_CHPASS "/usr/bin/passwd" #endif /* __FreeBSD__ */ #ifdef LOGIN_CAP @@ -1246,6 +1245,7 @@ return 0; } } +#ifndef __FreeBSD__ /* FreeBSD handle it later */ /* Fail if the account's expiration time has passed. */ if (pw->pw_expire != 0) { struct timeval tv; @@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ if (tv.tv_sec >= pw->pw_expire) return 0; } +#endif /* !__FreeBSD__ */ /* We found no reason not to let this user try to log on... */ return 1; } @@ -1268,6 +1269,12 @@ struct passwd *pw, pwcopy; int plen, ulen; char *use...

If one is using the pidfile as an indicator of sshd's status, it is possible to kill sshd before the sigterm handler gets installed, since the pidfile is written out before the signal handlers are setup. The solution is to simply write the pidfile after the signal handlers are setup. Here's the patch. Rob --- sshd.c.orig Fri Jun 22 11:16:41 2001 +++ sshd.c Fri Jun 22 11:18:32 2001 @@

...print *pw $2 = {pw_name = 0x8141000 "sshd", pw_passwd = 0x8141005 "", pw_uid = 10658, pw_gid = 1010, pw_change = 0, pw_class = 0x8141007 "", pw_gecos = 0x8141008 "SSH,,,", pw_dir = 0x814100f "/var/empty", pw_shell = 0x814101a "nologin", pw_expire = 0} Setting "Compression no" has no effect Setting "UsePrivilegeSeparation no" has no effect Tried several versions of openssh (including current ssh). All have the same problem. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are...

Hello, There has been an annoyance with OpenSSH that has been bugging me lately. It pays no attention to pw_change and pw_expire fields from the passwd file for users by default. Thus even if the admin has set a user's account to expire 5 days ago they can still login. So one might say, just add 'UseLogin yes' and all of your problems will be solved. This of course is not a good answer, because as has been noted...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2548 Bug ID: 2548 Summary: Make pam_set_data/pam_get_data work with OpenSSH Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: PAM support Assignee:

...field in utmpx.h... yes checking for ut_tv field in utmpx.h... yes checking for struct stat.st_blksize... yes checking for ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for __ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for pw_class field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_expire field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_change field in struct passwd... no checking if libc defines __progname... no checking whether getopt has optreset support... no checking if libc defines sys_errlist... yes checking if libc defines sys_nerr... yes checking for rsh... /usr/bin/rsh checkin...

...in utmpx.h... no checking for struct stat.st_blksize... yes checking for struct __res_state.retrans... yes checking for ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... yes checking for __ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for pw_class field in struct passwd... yes checking for pw_expire field in struct passwd... yes checking for pw_change field in struct passwd... yes checking for msg_accrights field in struct msghdr... no checking for msg_control field in struct msghdr... yes checking if libc defines __progname... yes checking whether gcc implements __FUNCTION__... yes checking w...

...d in utmpx.h... no checking for struct stat.st_blksize... yes checking for struct __res_state.retrans... no checking for ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... yes checking for __ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for pw_class field in struct passwd... yes checking for pw_expire field in struct passwd... yes checking for pw_change field in struct passwd... yes checking for msg_accrights field in struct msghdr... no checking for msg_control field in struct msghdr... yes checking if libc defines __progname... yes checking whether gcc implements __FUNCTION__... yes checking w...

...d in utmpx.h... no checking for struct stat.st_blksize... yes checking for struct __res_state.retrans... yes checking for ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... yes checking for __ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for pw_class field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_expire field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_change field in struct passwd... no checking for msg_accrights field in struct msghdr... no checking if struct statvfs.f_fsid is integral type... yes checking for msg_control field in struct msghdr... yes checking if libc defines __progname... yes checki...

...field in utmpx.h... yes checking for ut_tv field in utmpx.h... yes checking for struct stat.st_blksize... yes checking for ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for __ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for pw_class field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_expire field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_change field in struct passwd... no checking for msg_accrights field in struct msghdr... yes checking for msg_control field in struct msghdr... no checking if libc defines __progname... no checking whether gcc implements __FUNCTION__... yes checking whet...

...field in utmpx.h... no checking for ut_tv field in utmpx.h... yes checking for struct stat.st_blksize... yes checking for ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... no checking for __ss_family field in struct sockaddr_storage... yes checking for pw_class field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_expire field in struct passwd... no checking for pw_change field in struct passwd... no checking if libc defines __progname... yes checking whether getopt has optreset support... no checking if libc defines sys_errlist... yes checking if libc defines sys_nerr... yes checking for rsh... no checking for xau...