Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pv_dead_table".
2007 Apr 18
2
pte_offset_map + lazy mmu
Is pte_offset_map allowed to happen within lazy mmu? I presume not,
because you definitely don't want the mapping pte update to be deferred.
Or, more specifically, is kunmap_atomic ever allowed within lazy mmu?
I'm looking at kpte_clear_flush; I've already got a patch which turns
this into a pv_op, along with a Xen implementation. But I think its
probably an excess pv_op for a
2007 Apr 18
2
pte_offset_map + lazy mmu
Is pte_offset_map allowed to happen within lazy mmu? I presume not,
because you definitely don't want the mapping pte update to be deferred.
Or, more specifically, is kunmap_atomic ever allowed within lazy mmu?
I'm looking at kpte_clear_flush; I've already got a patch which turns
this into a pv_op, along with a Xen implementation. But I think its
probably an excess pv_op for a