Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "push_onto_threadsafe_queu".
Did you mean:
push_onto_threadsafe_queue
2015 Sep 04
2
[cfe-dev] Running tests on OS X 10.10 vs "Killed: 9"
...an
> artificial reason; wasn't during normal development) is that once you go
> past ~32K tests (2^15) lit's current way it queues up processes will cause
> it to completely hang on Mac. Essentially the problem is that it has a for
> loop like:
>
> for t in tests:
> push_onto_threadsafe_queue(t)
> ... kick off worker threads that consume from the queue ...
>
Maybe clearer:
for t in tests:
push_onto_threadsafe_queue(t)
...
kick off worker threads that consume from the queue
...
i.e. It pushes all tests onto the queue before it starts kicking off jobs.
-- Sean Silva
>...
2015 Sep 04
3
Running tests on OS X 10.10 vs "Killed: 9"
Hi,
building 'check-all' on any of my machines running OS X 10.10 usually fails
because a few tests fail due to some processes being killed by the kernel
(there's always "Killed: 9" somewhere in lit's error output). Everything's
fine on 10.9.
How do folks deal with this? Don't use 10.10 for building llvm? Is there
some tweakable to tell the kernel "please