search for: purview

I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have to do an OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest OS server under my purview. As this server is pretty low visibility, I'd like to see if I can start using EL 8 instead of 7.x. In the past, I was able to switch between different OS variants by simply changing out the yum.d files; EG: RHEL 6.x becomes CentOS 6.x by replacing a single RPM and doing a `yum -y clean al...

...uesday, April 9, 2019 7:40:01 AM PDT Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > > I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have to do > > an OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest OS server > > under my purview. As this server is pretty low visibility, I'd like to > > see if I can start using EL 8 instead of 7.x. > > > > In the past, I was able to switch between different OS variants by simply > > changing out the yum.d files; EG: RHEL 6.x becomes CentOS 6.x by replacing >...

...n rsync against a fileset where rsync will produce a checksum or something for those files and can then later determine what files have changed without maintaining a second copy of those files? I realize rsync is primarily a backup tool (and a great one!) and this probably falls outside of its purview. Any tips/tricks are welcome. Thanks, Jon

...I will try to redraft my query in a better way as follows. I have two datasets "A" and "B" containing the names of branch offices of a particular bank say XYZ plc bank. The XYZ bank has number of main branch offices (say Parent) and some small branch offices falling under the purview of these main branch offices (say Child). The datalist "A" and "B" consists of these main branch office names as well as small branch office names. B is subset of A and these branch names are coded. Thus we have two datasets A and B as (again I am using only a portion of a lar...

Anybody thought abt an adapter for this? Obviously not in the purview of ActiveRecord but could have a similar interface.. i.e. CRUD + find [xpath] - Ruby binding does exist. Just curious. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...cted >>> added >>> complexity? >> >> I shouldn't think it would be very expensive at all. > > Agreed. > >>> 2) Does SCCP also eliminate multiplying/dividing by 1 and >>> adding/subtracting 0? >> >> That's probably more the purview of instcombine. > > Right. SCCP with a good constant folder should definitely be able to take care of * 0 and */ 1 though. Not that i would go much further than this.

...optimize small arrays, but what is the expected >> added >> complexity? > > I shouldn't think it would be very expensive at all. Agreed. >> 2) Does SCCP also eliminate multiplying/dividing by 1 and >> adding/subtracting 0? > > That's probably more the purview of instcombine. Right. >> 4) Is DeadStoreElimination still necessary when we have >> AggressiveDCE? > > Probably, but I'll let others give the definitive answer. They are orthogonal. DSE touches stores, AggressiveDCE does mostly scalars. ADCE basically assumes all sto...

...untu/+source/linux/+bug/2002206 that suggest the message happens frequently, maybe if we're resuming the controller after runtime suspend? Maybe this should be a pci_info_once() sort of thing? I think there's some value in knowing that we're changing the BIOS configuration outside the purview of a driver, since I assume BIOS had some reason for hiding the HDA controller. > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> > Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de> > Cc: linux-pci at vger.kernel.org > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Fixes: b516ea586d71 ("PCI...

Hal, > 1 июня 2016 г., в 14:22, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> написал(а): > I agree that the 'openmp' runtime project logically fits within the purview of a 'parallel' project. We may even want to move it there eventually. We might also want it to remain separate while the project uses its own coding conventions (which are different from LLVM's coding conventions for historical reasons). We're not yet had that conversation, but it...

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

Sorry, but i wasn't sure the best place to post this. I was looking for some forums but it doesn't look like Xiph has any official ones. Anyways, i heard about this MT9 think a while ago and i thought it would be awesome if FLAC, Vorbis, and all could implement something like this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/may/27/news.seanmichaels http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT9 In

...nt register allocation. > think I need it to optimize small arrays, but what is the expected added > complexity? I shouldn't think it would be very expensive at all. > 2) Does SCCP also eliminate multiplying/dividing by 1 and > adding/subtracting 0? That's probably more the purview of instcombine. > 3) Is it arbitrary where to place InstructionCombining? Is there a better > order? Typically you'll want to place it after various kinds of propagation are done (for example, SCCP). You can run it multipe times. > 4) Is DeadStoreElimination still necessary when w...

...plying that LLVM is incomplete because it depends on GCC in the backend, which is incorrect. It depends on binutils, _which GCC also depends on_. Thus LLVM is certainly no less complete than GCC in that sense. I think the point is that implementing our own linker is definitely beyond the purview of LLVM, and implementing our own object file writer/assembler is honestly pretty low on the priority queue. GCC, the primary alternative, also depends on these things, so having them would be a competitive advantage, not a requirement for parity. > >>> Bill Wendling wrote: >...

Hi folks! I am currently involved in project which uses LLVM JIT and I have a couple of questions for you: 1) According to http://llvm.org/Features.html LLVM JIT supports only X86 and PowerPC, but LLVM code generator supports ARM too. Are there any plans for JIT to make support also for ARM backend? 2) Could LLVM JIT collect some hot traces from overall code and execute it separately (after

...intain web site, run a Twitter account, etc.) - Conference organization (would form ad-hoc review committees for individual conferences among other tasks) Not knowing exactly what the LLVM Foundation board does in its day-to-day work I don't know if one or more of these might fall under its purview. In my imagination, the LLVM Foundation board primarily handles legal aspects, funding and perhaps final arbitration. I'm not sure whether it should take on any other formal decision-making roles. I have some ideas on how to determine membership but they are just ideas. We'd want to kee...

The thread has lost focus and cherry picking replies.. To restate things since maybe you missed my points ---- 1) SE is a programming model and needs a home of it's own. Having a programming model with it's headers and all other stuff glued into a runtime project which intends to be universal and PM agnostic doesn't make sense. 1.1) The more I look, the most it seems SE is just a

On 4/8/19 3:20 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > I'm about to rebuild a server, currently running CentOS 6. If I have to do an > OS reinstall, my intention is to upgrade, as it's the oldest OS server under > my purview. As this server is pretty low visibility, I'd like to see if I can > start using EL 8 instead of 7.x. > > In the past, I was able to switch between different OS variants by simply > changing out the yum.d files; EG: RHEL 6.x becomes CentOS 6.x by replacing a > single RPM and...