Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pursur".
Did you mean:
pursue
2015 Aug 08
2
[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Clang devirtualization proposal
...r the function.
> All in all, I would prefer the stronger guarantee of the readonly
> attribute (that the memory location is unchanged, regardless of
> through which pointer it is accessed).
Perhaps this is indeed the only strategy that is completely self-consistent. I don't object to pursuring this.
> > As I said earlier, the original problem highlighted by Reid's
> > example
> > cannot currently occur: that could only happen if you remove the
> > @llvm.assume call (thus making the other argument unused). We
> > already don't do this (because th...
2015 Aug 08
2
[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Clang devirtualization proposal
...efer the stronger guarantee of the readonly
>> attribute (that the memory location is unchanged, regardless of through
>> which pointer it is accessed).
>>
>>
>> Perhaps this is indeed the only strategy that is completely
>> self-consistent. I don't object to pursuring this.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> As I said earlier, the original problem highlighted by Reid's example
>>> cannot currently occur: that could only happen if you remove the
>>> @llvm.assume call (thus making the other argument unused). We already do...
2015 Aug 08
4
[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Clang devirtualization proposal
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, "Sanjoy Das" <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>
> Cc: "cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers" <cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Sent: