search for: puristic

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and > 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need > more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake) Hi Sylvestre, Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?

Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> writes: >> These enhancements are critical for us because of the way our frontends >> work (less than ideal but we have to deal with it), due to some language >> quirks (casting in C, odd Fortran constructs, etc.) and because users >> sometimes stretch the boundaries of good taste :). >> >> Is this a reasonable approach?

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sylvestre Ledru via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 à 21:44, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > >> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 > >> and 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it >

On Thursday 02 February 2017 10:22:19 John Hodrien wrote: > The safe bet is, it doesn't, and it's something unique to you/your > profile/your firefox configuration. Have you got an example URL that > you're saying obviously misrenders in firefox? > > Does it still misbehave if you run firefox in safe mode with a new profile, > say be doing: firefox --ProfileManager

To any and all; I am attempting to build a Ubuntu PXE server, and have run into some problems. Here's where things stand at the moment: DHCP is working just fine. TFTP is sort of working. It wants to hand off a boot image, but... I always get the "cannot find kernel: linux" prompt. Typing in the name of the boot image, in my case, floppy.img, causes the image to get passed to the

On Feb 24, 2012, at 9:53 AM, David A. Greene wrote: > Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> writes: > >>> These enhancements are critical for us because of the way our frontends >>> work (less than ideal but we have to deal with it), due to some language >>> quirks (casting in C, odd Fortran constructs, etc.) and because users >>> sometimes stretch the

On Feb 23, 2012, at 8:20 AM, David Greene wrote: > I have a few enhancements to SCEV to help it identify more types of > recurrences. I want to send these upstream but I need a little > feedback. > > I've added ptrtoint and inttoptr SCEV expressions so that recurrences > involving these constructs can be recognized. However, this scary > comment gives me pause: >

Le 12/03/2016 à 14:15, Johan Engelen a écrit : > > > > I'm not sure how clean / dirty of a solution you'd be okay with, but > > I'd just point out that CMake developers provide working binary > > tarballs for Linux with every release at > https://cmake.org/download/ . > > So, if you are not a purist and/or need the CMake backport for

I'm currently reviewing the latest release of FreePBX (formerly known as Asterisk@Home). Do either of you know whether FreePBX is robust enough to handle multiple clients, or have any recommendations on front-end Web interface to manage client config & provide clients access to manage their level of access (similar to how Vonage, Teliax, and others provide client access to their web

I have a few enhancements to SCEV to help it identify more types of recurrences. I want to send these upstream but I need a little feedback. I've added ptrtoint and inttoptr SCEV expressions so that recurrences involving these constructs can be recognized. However, this scary comment gives me pause: // It's tempting to handle inttoptr and ptrtoint as no-ops, however this can //

Disclaimer/Apology: I am an R newbie I am seeing some behaviour that seems to me to be the result of some cacheing going on at some level, and perhaps this is expected behaviour. I would just like to understand the basic rules. What I have is a file with some data. I read it in and then do a summary on the resulting dataframe. I find the some values are completely outside the expected range,

...vealing a programmeR's thinko / bug / .., something where the code was clearly suboptimal and should've been improved. (Unfortunately, the bug has often been in packages, and sometimes I had to disable the setting when I wanted that "buggy" package to work ..) Occasionally being puristic, let me state this: __________________________________________________________________ /------------------------------------------------------------------\ | | | Every careful R programmer should use (something like "tr...

I'd like to get some more perspectives on the role of the VirtualFileSystem abstraction in llvm/Support. (The VFS layer has recently moved from Clang to LLVM, so crossposting to both lists) https://reviews.llvm.org/D54277 proposed adding a function to VirtualFileSystem to get the underlying "real file" path from a VFS path. LLDB is starting to use VFS for some filesystem

I've been trying to get R+PostgreSQL+PL/R to work together on a OSX machine without the Framework and CoreFoundation options and have noticed some suspicious switches when compiling packages. I've installed R (on OSX) with the following ./configure: ./configure \ CC="gcc -arch i386" \ CXX="g++ -arch i386" \ OBJC="gcc -arch i386" \

The Wine development release 1.5.10 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - New version of the Gecko engine based on Firefox 14. - Support for OpenGL in the DIB engine using libOSMesa. - Off-screen rendering is now the default in Direct3D. - Some more WMI infrastructure. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:

There has been recent discussion about alternatives to the model-based standard error estimators for lm. While some people like the sandwich estimator and others don't, it is clear that neither estimator dominates the other for any sane loss function. It is also worth noting that the sandwich estimator is the default for t.test(). I think it would be useful for models using other

Can anyone point me to a how to or beginners guide to setting up LDAP authentication on CentOS5 with replication?

...confusing to those using str(tapply), args(tapply) or similar inspection to quickly get a glimpse of the function user "interface". That's why we typically don't do that and rather slightly cheat with the formal default, for the above "didactical" purposes. If you are puristic about this, then missing() should almost never be used when the function argument has a formal default. I don't have a too strong opinion here, and we do have quite a few other cases, where the formal default argument is not always used because of if(missing(.)) clauses. I think I could be...

On Jul 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, David Blaikie wrote: >> The dangerous part of this is that characters are integers, so "foo" + 'x' is very likely to cause serious problems. > > std::string already provides such overloads though, doesn't it? So the > code isn't any safer from accidental "foo" + 'x' expressions that > don't include

On 20030610: Gregory Maxwell wrote: (in reply to Ralph Giles) >> I assume you're aware of the technical documentation on dolby's site? >> (http://www.dolby.com/pro/) In particular the surround mixing guide has >> a lot of detailed guidelines. I don't have any practical experience >> with it though, so I can't vouch for it. >Yes I am. I've done a