search for: pullrequests

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> One possibility would also be to consider a "numbers-only" or >> >> rather "same type"-only {e.g., would also work for characters} >> >> version. >> >> > I don't know what you mean by these. >> >> In the

All, Martin: Thanks for this and all the other things you are doing to both drive R forward and engage more with the community about things like this. Apologies for missing this discussion the first time it came around and if anything here has already been brought up, but I wonder what exactly you mean when you want recycling behavior. Specifically, based on an unrelated discussion with Henrik

Finally getting back to this : >>>>> Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> >>>>> on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:51:35 -0500 writes: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Hadley Wickham > <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> One possibility would also be to consider a >>> "numbers-only" or >>

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:09 AM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Strong -1 personally. Likewise, for many of the same reasons detailed below. ~Aaron > * What is the endgoal? To fully kill phab and move to github pullrequests? > it might be best to discuss *that* first. (did i miss an RFC?) > * Separation of attention - does everyone who cares > now has to also look at pull requests for reviews; > or should they be exempt from general review attention? > * For me personally after using phabricator,...

...atic aspects of GitHub and it raising the bar for existing contributors. Just my two cents in. On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:09 AM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Strong -1 personally. > > * What is the endgoal? To fully kill phab and move to github pullrequests? > it might be best to discuss *that* first. (did i miss an RFC?) > * Separation of attention - does everyone who cares > now has to also look at pull requests for reviews; > or should they be exempt from general review attention? > * For me personally after using phabricator,...

>>>>> Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> >>>>> on Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:56:04 -0800 writes: > All, > Martin: Thanks for this and all the other things you are doing to both > drive R forward and engage more with the community about things like this. > Apologies for missing this discussion the first time it came around and if

...hu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:09 AM Roman Lebedev via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Strong -1 personally. Likewise, for many of the same reasons detailed below. ~Aaron > * What is the endgoal? To fully kill phab and move to github pullrequests? > it might be best to discuss *that* first. (did i miss an RFC?) > * Separation of attention - does everyone who cares > now has to also look at pull requests for reviews; > or should they be exempt from general review attention? > * For me personally after using phabricator,...

Just stating, in 'ifelse', 'test' is not recycled. As I said in "R-intro: length of 'ifelse' result" (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-September/073136.html), ifelse(condition, a, b) returns a vector of the length of 'condition', even if 'a' or 'b' is longer. On current 'ifelse' code in R: * The part ans[nas] <- NA

...ts.llvm.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > Strong -1 personally. >>> >>> Likewise, for many of the same reasons detailed below. >>> >>> ~Aaron >>> >>> > * What is the endgoal? To fully kill phab and move to github >>> pullrequests? >>> > it might be best to discuss *that* first. (did i miss an RFC?) >>> > * Separation of attention - does everyone who cares >>> > now has to also look at pull requests for reviews; >>> > or should they be exempt from general review attention...

Hi all, Now that we're on GitHub, we can discuss about pull-requests. I'd like to propose to enable pull-request on GitHub, as a first step as an experimental channel alongside the existing methods for contributing to LLVM. This would allow to find workflow issues and address them, and also LLVM contributors in general to start getting familiar with pull-requests without committing to

...gt; > >>>> > Strong -1 personally. >>>> >>>> Likewise, for many of the same reasons detailed below. >>>> >>>> ~Aaron >>>> >>>> > * What is the endgoal? To fully kill phab and move to github >>>> pullrequests? >>>> > it might be best to discuss *that* first. (did i miss an RFC?) >>>> > * Separation of attention - does everyone who cares >>>> > now has to also look at pull requests for reviews; >>>> > or should they be exempt from general...

>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> >>>>> on Sat, 26 Nov 2016 17:14:01 +0000 writes: > Just stating, in 'ifelse', 'test' is not recycled. As I said in "R-intro: length of 'ifelse' result" (https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-September/073136.html), ifelse(condition, a,