search for: pud_val

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 39 matches for "pud_val".

Did you mean: pmd_val
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 08/17] paravirt_ops - memory managment
...clude/asm-x86_64/page.h +++ clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/page.h @@ -64,16 +64,44 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pg typedef struct { unsigned long pgprot; } pgprot_t; +static inline unsigned long native_pte_val(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte.pte; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pud_val(pud_t pud) +{ + return pud.pud; +} + + +static inline unsigned long native_pmd_val(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return pmd.pmd; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd) +{ + return pgd.pgd; +} + + +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT +#include <asm/paravirt.h> +#else + #define pte_val(x) ((x).pte)...
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 08/17] paravirt_ops - memory managment
...clude/asm-x86_64/page.h +++ clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/page.h @@ -64,16 +64,44 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pg typedef struct { unsigned long pgprot; } pgprot_t; +static inline unsigned long native_pte_val(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte.pte; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pud_val(pud_t pud) +{ + return pud.pud; +} + + +static inline unsigned long native_pmd_val(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return pmd.pmd; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd) +{ + return pgd.pgd; +} + + +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT +#include <asm/paravirt.h> +#else + #define pte_val(x) ((x).pte)...
2008 Jan 21
7
[PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes
This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and boot on x86_64. This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber.
2008 Jan 21
7
[PATCH 0/4] paravirt_ops-64 compile fixes
This series contain fixes to make the paravirt_ops code compile and boot on x86_64. This is a follow-up for the previous series from Glauber.
2007 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part
Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet
2007 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part
Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Nov 09
11
[PATCH 0/24] paravirt_ops for unified x86 - that's me again!
Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing
2007 Apr 18
2
2.6.19-rc5-mm2: paravirt X86_PAE=y compile error
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:16:26 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Paravirt breaks CONFIG_X86_PAE=y compilation: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC init/main.o > In file included from include2/asm/pgtable.h:245, > from > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/include/linux/mm.h:40, > from >
2007 Apr 18
2
2.6.19-rc5-mm2: paravirt X86_PAE=y compile error
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:16:26 +0100 Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote: > Paravirt breaks CONFIG_X86_PAE=y compilation: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC init/main.o > In file included from include2/asm/pgtable.h:245, > from > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm2/include/linux/mm.h:40, > from >
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Aug 10
9
[PATCH 0/25 -v2] paravirt_ops for x86_64, second round
Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do
2007 Aug 15
13
[PATCH 0/25][V3] pvops_64 last round (hopefully)
This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it
2007 Aug 15
13
[PATCH 0/25][V3] pvops_64 last round (hopefully)
This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
...sm-x86_64/page.h +++ linux-2.6.19-quilt/include/asm-x86_64/page.h @@ -64,16 +64,44 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pg typedef struct { unsigned long pgprot; } pgprot_t; +static inline unsigned long native_pte_val(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte.pte; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pud_val(pud_t pud) +{ + return pud.pud; +} + + +static inline unsigned long native_pmd_val(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return pmd.pmd; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd) +{ + return pgd.pgd; +} + + +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT +#include <asm/paravirt.h> +#else + #define pte_val(x) ((x).pte)...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] x86_64 paravirt_ops port
...sm-x86_64/page.h +++ linux-2.6.19-quilt/include/asm-x86_64/page.h @@ -64,16 +64,44 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long pgd; } pg typedef struct { unsigned long pgprot; } pgprot_t; +static inline unsigned long native_pte_val(pte_t pte) +{ + return pte.pte; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pud_val(pud_t pud) +{ + return pud.pud; +} + + +static inline unsigned long native_pmd_val(pmd_t pmd) +{ + return pmd.pmd; +} + +static inline unsigned long native_pgd_val(pgd_t pgd) +{ + return pgd.pgd; +} + + +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT +#include <asm/paravirt.h> +#else + #define pte_val(x) ((x).pte)...
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 01/17] paravirt_ops - core changes
...+ .pte_update = (void *)native_nop, + .pte_update_defer = (void *)native_nop, + + .ptep_get_and_clear = native_ptep_get_and_clear, + + .pte_clear = native_pte_clear, + .pmd_clear = native_pmd_clear, + .pud_clear = native_pud_clear, + .pgd_clear = native_pgd_clear, + + .pte_val = native_pte_val, + .pud_val = native_pud_val, + .pmd_val = native_pmd_val, + .pgd_val = native_pgd_val, + + .make_pte = native_make_pte, + .make_pmd = native_make_pmd, + .make_pud = native_make_pud, + .make_pgd = native_make_pgd, + + .swapgs = native_swapgs, + .sysret = native_sysret, + .iret = native_iret, + + .dup_mmap = (v...
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 01/17] paravirt_ops - core changes
...+ .pte_update = (void *)native_nop, + .pte_update_defer = (void *)native_nop, + + .ptep_get_and_clear = native_ptep_get_and_clear, + + .pte_clear = native_pte_clear, + .pmd_clear = native_pmd_clear, + .pud_clear = native_pud_clear, + .pgd_clear = native_pgd_clear, + + .pte_val = native_pte_val, + .pud_val = native_pud_val, + .pmd_val = native_pmd_val, + .pgd_val = native_pgd_val, + + .make_pte = native_make_pte, + .make_pmd = native_make_pmd, + .make_pud = native_make_pud, + .make_pgd = native_make_pgd, + + .swapgs = native_swapgs, + .sysret = native_sysret, + .iret = native_iret, + + .dup_mmap = (v...
2018 Aug 13
11
[PATCH v2 00/11] x86/paravirt: several cleanups
This series removes some no longer needed stuff from paravirt infrastructure and puts large quantities of paravirt ops under a new config option PARAVIRT_XXL which is selected by XEN_PV only. A pvops kernel without XEN_PV being configured is about 2.5% smaller with this series applied. tip commit 5800dc5c19f34e6e03b5adab1282535cb102fafd ("x86/paravirt: Fix spectre-v2 mitigations for
2020 Aug 07
0
[PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from PARAVIRT_XXL
...al_t, mmu.pmd_val, - pmd.pmd, (u64)pmd.pmd >> 32); - else - ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pmdval_t, mmu.pmd_val, pmd.pmd); + ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pmdval_t, mmu.pmd_val, pmd.pmd); return ret; } @@ -504,12 +463,9 @@ static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud) { pudval_t val = native_pud_val(pud); - if (sizeof(pudval_t) > sizeof(long)) - PVOP_VCALL3(mmu.set_pud, pudp, val, (u64)val >> 32); - else - PVOP_VCALL2(mmu.set_pud, pudp, val); + PVOP_VCALL2(mmu.set_pud, pudp, val); } -#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS >= 4 + static inline pud_t __pud(pudval_t val) { pudval_t ret; @...